Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kristin E. Brzeski

dblp:402/3566 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming
0.912025
Constraint Optimisation Approaches for Designing Group-Living Captive Breeding Programmes · AAAI 2025
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.312025
Constraint Optimisation Approaches for Designing Group-Living Captive Breeding Programmes · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constraint optimization · 2.6ablation study · 2.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Constraint Optimisation Approaches for Designing Group-Living Captive Breeding Programmes
abstract
Captive breeding programs play a critical role in combating the ongoing biodiversity crisis by preserving the most endangered species and supporting reintroduction efforts. Maintaining the genetic health of captive populations requires careful management to prevent inbreeding and maximize the effective population size. Decisions about which males and females should be bred together are guided by the principle of minimizing relatedness between pairs. Methods to select breeding pairs are well developed, however, some species' ecology requires them to live in groups, and evaluating optimal groupings of multiple males and females that would be suitable to breed together is a more complex problem. Current computational tools to support the design of group-living captive breeding programs suffer from challenges of scalability and flexibility. In this paper we demonstrate the applicability of constraint programming (CP) approaches to optimize breeding groups to minimize relatedness. We present the example of the Galapagos giant tortoises as the test case used to develop our approach. Exploration of the needs of this captive breeding program has informed the development of our flexible approach to capture the constraints on viable captive breeding program design. Our findings have directly informed the implementation of new group configurations at the captive breeding centre. We further demonstrate that our approach is broadly applicable in other contexts through a second case study, providing multi-objective optimisation of a breeding program of canids. Through these case studies and an ablation study using synthetic datasets, we show that our constraint optimisation approach provides an expressive and generalizable means to support captive breeding program design, including scaling to large captive populations, which are currently intractable using current computational methods.
Matthew Forshaw, Rachel Gray, Bridgett vonHoldt, Alexander Ochoa, Joshua M. Miller, Kristin E. Brzeski, Adalgisa Caccone, Evelyn L. Jensen
AAAI6