Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Haotian Qin

dblp:402/4876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-1022-2971ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI-generated content detection
AI-generated image detection
1.012026
Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image forensics
forgery detection
1.012026
Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model reasoning
1.012026
Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature fusion · 1.0cross-attention · 1.0DINO · 1.0CLIP · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning
abstract
Accurate and interpretable detection of AI-generated images is essential for mitigating risks associated with AI misuse. However, the substantial domain gap among generative models makes it challenging to develop a generalizable forgery detection model. Moreover, since every pixel in an AI-generated image is synthesized, traditional saliency-based forgery explanation methods are not well suited for this task. To address these challenges, we formulate detection and explanation as a unified Forgery Detection and Reasoning task (FDR-Task), leveraging Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to provide accurate detection through reliable reasoning over forgery attributes. To facilitate this task, we introduce the Multi-Modal Forgery Reasoning dataset (MMFR-Dataset), a large-scale dataset containing 120K images across 10 generative models, with 378K reasoning annotations on forgery attributes, enabling comprehensive evaluation of the FDR-Task. Furthermore, we propose FakeReasoning, a forgery detection and reasoning framework with three key components: 1) a dual-branch visual encoder that integrates CLIP and DINO to capture both high-level semantics and low-level artifacts; 2) a Forgery-Aware Feature Fusion Module that leverages DINO's attention maps and cross-attention mechanisms to guide MLLMs toward forgery-related clues; 3) a Classification Probability Mapper that couples language modeling and forgery detection, enhancing overall performance. Experiments across multiple generative models demonstrate that FakeReasoning not only achieves robust generalization but also outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both detection and reasoning tasks. The code is available at: https://github.com/PRIS-CV/FakeReasoning.
Yueying Gao, Dongliang Chang, Bingyao Yu, Haotian Qin, Muxi Diao, Lei Chen 0069, Kongming Liang, Zhanyu Ma
IEEE Trans. Image Process.4