Fabiola Ricci

dblp:402/5178 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 1.7online SGD · 1.7FastICA · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions
abstract
Deep neural networks learn structured features from complex, non-Gaussian inputs, but the mechanisms behind this process remain poorly understood. Our work is motivated by the observation that the first-layer filters learnt by deep convolutional neural networks from natural images resemble those learnt by independent component analysis (ICA), a simple unsupervised method that seeks the most non-Gaussian projections of its inputs. This similarity suggests that ICA provides a simple, yet principled model for studying feature learning. Here, we leverage this connection to investigate the interplay between data structure and optimisation in feature learning for the most popular ICA algorithm, FastICA, and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), which is used to train deep networks. We rigorously establish that FastICA requires at least $n\gtrsim d^4$ samples to recover a single non-Gaussian direction from $d$-dimensional inputs on a simple synthetic data model. We show that vanilla online SGD outperforms FastICA, and prove that the optimal sample complexity $n\gtrsim d^2$ can be reached by smoothing the loss, albeit in a data-dependent way. We finally demonstrate the existence of a search phase for FastICA on ImageNet, and discuss how the strong non-Gaussianity of said images compensates for the poor sample complexity of FastICA.
Fabiola Ricci, Lorenzo Bardone, Sebastian Goldt
ICML1