Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bingsheng Bi

dblp:402/7638 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-6591-0714ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 60% Malware analysis · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial machine learning
0.912025
Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers · WWW 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack › backdoor poisoning attacks
clean-label backdoor attack
0.912025
Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers · WWW 2025
Malware analysis › malware detection
machine-learning-based malware detection
0.912025
Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers · WWW 2025
Malware analysis
malware detection evasion
0.912025
Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers · WWW 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
0.912025
Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trigger injection · 0.9similarity measurement · 0.9clean-label poisoning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PanThreat: Global Resource-Based Anomaly Detection for APTs
abstract
Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs), due to their stealthiness and complexity, have become a significant security challenge for modern enterprises, often causing severe economic losses. To address these threats, researchers have proposed using provenance graphs to model system entities and their dependencies, aiming to capture the complex scenarios of APT attacks. However, existing Provenance-based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDS) still suffer from the following challenges: (1) Historical interaction information loss due to the truncation of long-term interaction scenarios; (2) The difficulty in capturing long-distance dependencies leads to the loss of crucial contextual information; (3) Existing methods struggle to balance detection efficiency and granularity. We introduce PanThreat, an online detection system that performs fine-grained, real-time analysis of host system logs to identify malicious activities. PanThreat combines attributes encoding through Word2Vec and position encoding using Laplacian feature matrices, while retaining long-term interaction histories and effectively modeling long-range dependencies within provenance graphs. This integrated approach significantly enhances detection accuracy. Additionally, PanThreat leverages the parallel processing capabilities of Graph Transformers to improve detection efficiency. Evaluations on the DARPA E3 dataset and StreamSpot database demonstrate PanThreat's effectiveness in detecting complex APT attacks, outperforming four state-of-the-art methods while maintaining an average processing speed of 58,140 events per second.
Weiheng Wu, Bingsheng Bi, Wei Qiao 0005, Bo Jiang 0013
CSCWD3
2025 Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware Classifiers
abstract
Machine Learning (ML) based malware classifiers are vulnerable to exploitation during the training phase due to the necessity of regular retraining with samples collected from the wild. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of backdoor attacks in the malware domain, where attackers can manipulate the model during training by injecting samples embedded with specific triggers, causing the model to establish an association between the trigger and a designated class, thereby achieving evasion of detection. While research on backdoor attacks has been extensively explored in the field of computer vision, it has been largely overlooked in the malware domain. Unlike in the computer vision domain, the threat model in the malware domain typically restricts attackers to employing clean-label attacks (i.e., attackers do not have control over the labeling of poisoned data). However, clean-label attack methods are generally less effective compared to those that involve embedding triggers and altering sample labels to the target class (called corrupted-label attacks). To address this limitation, we propose a simple yet effective method that involves Poisoning Malware-Similar Benignware (PMSB) instead of random selection, thereby approximating the scenario of corrupted-label attacks and enhancing the effectiveness of clean-label attacks. Additionally, we introduce three similarity measurement methods based on feature-based distance, distribution-based distance, and contribution-based difference to select malware-similar benignware. Comprehensive evaluations across three different trigger types and three datasets demonstrate the superiority and general applicability of PMSB.
Xutong Wang, Yun Feng 0003, Bingsheng Bi, Yaqin Cao, Ze Jin, Xinyu Liu 0019, Yunpeng Li 0006
WWW3