Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sean Bocirnea
dblp:403/4117
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-5231-8618ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 56% Programming languages and type systems · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
closure conversion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Type-Preserving Flat Closure Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › language implementation
type-preserving compilation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Type-Preserving Flat Closure Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
type safety proof · 0.9subject reduction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Type-Preserving Flat Closure OptimizationabstractType-preserving compilation seeks to make intent as much as a part of compilation as computation . Specifications of intent in the form of types are preserved and exploited during compilation and linking, alongside the mere computation of a program. This provides lightweight guarantees for compilation, optimization, and linking. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation typically interferes with important optimizations. In this paper, we study typed closure representation and optimization. We analyze limitations in prior typed closure conversion representations, and the requirements of many important closure optimizations. We design a new typed closure representation in our Flat-Closure Calculus (FCC) that admits all these optimizations, prove type safety and subject reduction of FCC, prove type preservation from an existing closure converted IR to FCC, and implement common closure optimizations for FCC. Adam T. Geller, Sean Bocirnea, Chester J. F. Gould, Paulette Koronkevich, William J. Bowman |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |