Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chester J. F. Gould

dblp:403/5699 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-6365-7171ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 56% Programming languages and type systems · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
closure conversion
0.912025
Type-Preserving Flat Closure Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Programming languages and type systems › language implementation
type-preserving compilation
0.912025
Type-Preserving Flat Closure Optimization · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

type safety proof · 0.9subject reduction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Type-Preserving Flat Closure Optimization
abstract
Type-preserving compilation seeks to make intent as much as a part of compilation as computation . Specifications of intent in the form of types are preserved and exploited during compilation and linking, alongside the mere computation of a program. This provides lightweight guarantees for compilation, optimization, and linking. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation typically interferes with important optimizations. In this paper, we study typed closure representation and optimization. We analyze limitations in prior typed closure conversion representations, and the requirements of many important closure optimizations. We design a new typed closure representation in our Flat-Closure Calculus (FCC) that admits all these optimizations, prove type safety and subject reduction of FCC, prove type preservation from an existing closure converted IR to FCC, and implement common closure optimizations for FCC.
Adam T. Geller, Sean Bocirnea, Chester J. F. Gould, Paulette Koronkevich, William J. Bowman
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.3