VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hongjin Zhong
dblp:404/6142
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 77% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scientific machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ECD: A Machine Learning Benchmark for Predicting Enhanced-Precision Electronic Charge Density in Crystalline Inorganic Materials · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials science simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ECD: A Machine Learning Benchmark for Predicting Enhanced-Precision Electronic Charge Density in Crystalline Inorganic Materials · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ECD: A Machine Learning Benchmark for Predicting Enhanced-Precision Electronic Charge Density in Crystalline Inorganic Materials · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.7density functional theory · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ECD: A Machine Learning Benchmark for Predicting Enhanced-Precision Electronic Charge Density in Crystalline Inorganic MaterialsabstractSupervised machine learning techniques are increasingly being adopted to speed up electronic structure predictions, serving as alternatives to first-principles methods like Density Functional Theory (DFT). Although current DFT datasets mainly emphasize chemical properties and atomic forces, the precise prediction of electronic charge density is essential for accurately determining a system's total energy and ground state properties. In this study, we introduce a novel electronic charge density dataset named ECD, which encompasses 140,646 stable crystal geometries with medium-precision Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional data. Within this dataset, a subset of 7,147 geometries includes high-precision electronic charge density data calculated using the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof (HSE) functional in DFT. By designing various benchmark tasks for crystalline materials and emphasizing training with large-scale PBE data while fine-tuning with a smaller subset of high-precision HSE data, we demonstrate the efficacy of current machine learning models in predicting electronic charge densities.
The ECD dataset and baseline models are open-sourced to support community efforts in developing new methodologies and accelerating materials design and applications. Pin Chen, Zexin Xu, Qing Mo, Hongjin Zhong, Fengyang Xu, Yutong Lu |
ICLR | 4 |