Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ulrich Rueckert

dblp:404/6586 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing
0.912025
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge injection
0.912025
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

update pruning · 0.9text augmentation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it
abstract
Large language models continually learn through the accumulation of gradient-based updates, but how individual pieces of new information affect existing knowledge, leading to both beneficial generalization and problematic hallucination, remains poorly understood. We demonstrate that when learning new information, LLMs exhibit a "priming" effect: learning a new fact can cause the model to inappropriately apply that knowledge in unrelated contexts. To systematically study this phenomenon, we introduce "Outlandish," a carefully curated dataset of 1320 diverse text samples designed to probe how new knowledge permeates through an LLM's existing knowledge base. Using this dataset, we show that the degree of priming after learning new information can be predicted by measuring the token probability of key words before training. This relationship holds robustly across different model architectures (PALM-2, Gemma, Llama), sizes, and training stages. Finally, we develop two novel techniques to modulate how new knowledge affects existing model behavior: (1) a ``stepping-stone'' text augmentation strategy and (2) an ``ignore-k'' update pruning method. These approaches reduce undesirable priming effects by 50-95% while preserving the model's ability to learn new information. Our findings provide both empirical insights into how LLMs learn and practical tools for improving the specificity of knowledge insertion in language models. Further materials: https://sunchipsster1.github.io/projects/outlandish/
Renat Aksitov, Andrey Zhmoginov, Nolan Andrew Miller, Max Vladymyrov, Ulrich Rueckert, Been Kim, Mark Sandler 0002
ICLR6