Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ulrich Rueckert
dblp:404/6586
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge injection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
update pruning · 0.9text augmentation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute itabstractLarge language models continually learn through the accumulation of gradient-based updates, but how individual pieces of new information affect existing knowledge, leading to both beneficial generalization and problematic hallucination, remains poorly understood. We demonstrate that when learning new information, LLMs exhibit a "priming" effect: learning a new fact can cause the model to inappropriately apply that knowledge in unrelated contexts.
To systematically study this phenomenon, we introduce "Outlandish," a carefully curated dataset of 1320 diverse text samples designed to probe how new knowledge permeates through an LLM's existing knowledge base. Using this dataset, we show that the degree of priming after learning new information can be predicted by measuring the token probability of key words before training. This relationship holds robustly across different model architectures (PALM-2, Gemma, Llama), sizes, and training stages.
Finally, we develop two novel techniques to modulate how new knowledge affects existing model behavior: (1) a ``stepping-stone'' text augmentation strategy and (2) an ``ignore-k'' update pruning method. These approaches reduce undesirable priming effects by 50-95% while preserving the model's ability to learn new information. Our findings provide both empirical insights into how LLMs learn and practical tools for improving the specificity of knowledge insertion in language models. Further materials: https://sunchipsster1.github.io/projects/outlandish/ Renat Aksitov, Andrey Zhmoginov, Nolan Andrew Miller, Max Vladymyrov, Ulrich Rueckert, Been Kim, Mark Sandler 0002 |
ICLR | 6 |