Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pin-Siang Huang

dblp:405/1035 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 56% Question answering and dialogue systems · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge-based systems
knowledge-intensive reasoning
0.912025
PathwiseRAG: Multi-Dimensional Exploration and Integration Framework · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning
0.912025
PathwiseRAG: Multi-Dimensional Exploration and Integration Framework · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
multi-dimensional retrieval
0.912025
PathwiseRAG: Multi-Dimensional Exploration and Integration Framework · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
PathwiseRAG: Multi-Dimensional Exploration and Integration Framework · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel path exploration · 1.7intent-aware retrieval · 1.7dynamic reasoning network · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PathwiseRAG: Multi-Dimensional Exploration and Integration Framework
abstract
Conventional retrieval-augmented generation(RAG) systems employ rigid retrieval strategies that create: (1) knowledge blind spots across domain boundaries, (2) reasoning fragmentation when processing interdependent concepts, and (3) contradictions from conflicting evidence sources. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce PathwiseRAG, which addresses these challenges through: intent-aware strategy selection to eliminate blind spots, dynamic reasoning networks that capture sub-problem interdependencies to overcome fragmentation, and parallel path exploration with adaptive refinement to resolve conflicts. The framework models query intent across semantic and reasoning dimensions, constructs a directed acyclic graph of interconnected sub-problems, and explores multiple reasoning trajectories while continuously adapting to emerging evidence. Evaluation across challenging benchmarks demonstrates significant improvements over state-of-the-art RAG systems, with average accuracy gains of 4.9% and up to 6.9% on complex queries, establishing a new paradigm for knowledge-intensive reasoning by transforming static retrieval into dynamic, multi-dimensional exploration.
Pin-Siang Huang, Peican Lin, Yao-Ching Yu, Yulu Du
EMNLP2