Given an undirected graph \(G = (V, E, w)\), a Gomory-Hu tree \(T\) (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a tree on \(V\) that preserves all-pairs mincuts of \(G\) exactly.

Given an undirected, weighted graph $G=(V, E, w)$, a Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a tree T over the vertex set V such that for every pair of vertices $s, t \in V$, the ($s, t$) min-cut in T is also an ($s, t$) min-cut in G and has the same value. In this article, we give the first deterministic almost-linear-time algorithm for constructing a Gomory-Hu tree. Our algorithm runs in $m^{1+o(1)}$-time, where m denotes the number of edges in the input graph G; this is clearly optimal up to the $m^{o(1)}$ term in the running time. Prior to our work, the best deterministic algorithm for this problem dated back to the original algorithm of Gomory and Hu that runs in $n m^{1+o(1)}$ time using current maxflow algorithms. In fact, our algorithm is also the first almost-linear-time deterministic algorithm for even simpler problems, such as finding the k-edge-connected components of a graph. Our new result hinges on two separate and novel components that each introduce a distinct set of de-randomization tools of independent interest: - a deterministic reduction from the all-pairs min-cuts problem to the single-source min-cuts problem incurring only sub-polynomial overhead, and - a deterministic almost-linear time algorithm for the singlesource min-cuts problem.

Combining large language models with evolutionary computation algorithms represents a promising research direction leveraging the remarkable generative and in-context learning capabilities of LLMs with the strengths of evolutionary algorithms. In this work, we present EvoCAD, a method for generating computer-aided design (CAD) objects through their symbolic representations using vision language models and evolutionary optimization. Our method samples multiple CAD objects, which are then optimized using an evolutionary approach with vision language and reasoning language models. We assess our method using GPT-4V and GPT-4o, evaluating it on the CAD-Prompt benchmark dataset and comparing it to prior methods. Additionally, we introduce two new metrics based on topological properties defined by the Euler characteristic, which capture a form of semantic similarity between 3D objects. Our results demonstrate that EvoCAD outperforms previous approaches on multiple metrics, particularly in generating topologically correct objects, which can be efficiently evaluated using our two novel metrics that complement existing spatial metrics.

Combining natural language and geometric shapes is an emerging research area with multiple applications in robotics and language-assisted design. A crucial task in this domain is object referent identification, which involves selecting a 3D object given a textual description of the target. Variability in language descriptions and spatial relationships of 3D objects makes this a complex task, increasing the need to better understand the behavior of neural network models in this domain. However, limited research has been conducted in this area. Specifically, when a model makes an incorrect prediction despite being provided with a seemingly correct object description, practitioners are left wondering: "Why is the model wrong?". In this work, we present a method answering this question by generating counterfactual examples. Our method takes a misclassified sample, which includes two objects and a text description, and generates an alternative yet similar formulation that would have resulted in a correct prediction by the model. We have evaluated our approach with data from the ShapeTalk dataset along with three distinct models. Our counterfactual examples maintain the structure of the original description, are semantically similar and meaningful. They reveal weaknesses in the description, model bias and enhance the understanding of the models behavior. Theses insights help practitioners to better interact with systems as well as engineers to improve models.