Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tommaso Galliena
dblp:405/3635
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embodied Image Captioning: Self-Supervised Learning Agents for Spatially Coherent Image Descriptions · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
self-supervised fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embodied Image Captioning: Self-Supervised Learning Agents for Spatially Coherent Image Descriptions · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9consensus mechanism · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Embodied Image Captioning: Self-Supervised Learning Agents for Spatially Coherent Image DescriptionsabstractWe present a self-supervised method to improve an agent's abilities in describing arbitrary objects while actively exploring a generic environment. This is a challenging problem, as current models struggle to obtain coherent image captions due to different camera viewpoints and clutter. We propose a three-phase framework to fine-tune existing captioning models that enhances caption accuracy and consistency across views via a consensus mechanism. First, an agent explores the environment, collecting noisy image-caption pairs. Then, a consistent pseudo-caption for each object instance is distilled via consensus using a large language model. Finally, these pseudo-captions are used to fine-tune an off-the-shelf captioning model, with the addition of contrastive learning. We analyse the performance of the combination of captioning models, exploration policies, pseudo-labeling methods, and fine-tuning strategies, on our manually labeled test set. Results show that a policy can be trained to mine samples with higher disagreement compared to classical baselines. Our pseudo-captioning method, in combination with all policies, has a higher semantic similarity compared to other existing methods, and fine-tuning improves caption accuracy and consistency by a significant margin. Code and test set annotations available at https://hsp-iit.github.io/embodied-captioning/ Tommaso Galliena, Tommaso Apicella, Stefano Rosa, Pietro Morerio, Alessio Del Bue, Lorenzo Natale |
ICCV | 1 |