Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe

dblp:405/3824 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 38% Language models and text generation · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.912025
Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question classification
0.912025
Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question understanding
0.312025
Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

language model evaluation · 0.9dataset construction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions
abstract
Distinguishing between rhetorical questions and informational questions is a challenging task, as many rhetorical questions have similar surface forms to informational questions.Existing datasets, however, do not contain many questions that can be rhetorical or informational in different contexts.We introduce Studying Rhetorically Ambiguous Questions (SRAQ), a new dataset explicitly constructed to support the study of such rhetorical ambiguity.The questions in SRAQ can be interpreted as either rhetorical or informational depending on the context.We evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art language models on this dataset and find that they struggle to recognize many rhetorical questions.
Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe, Eduardo Blanco 0002, Ellen Riloff
EMNLP1
2025 BEMEAE: Moving Beyond Exact Span Match for Event Argument Extraction
abstract
Enfa Fane, Md Nayem Uddin, Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe, Daniyal Kashif, Eduardo Blanco, Steven Corman. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Enfa Fane, Md Nayem Uddin, Oghenevovwe Ikumariegbe, Daniyal Kashif, Eduardo Blanco 0002, Steven R. Corman
NAACL (Long Papers)3