Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaeeon Park
dblp:405/6173
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0410-6457ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
document ranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document Summarization · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document Summarization · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
query formulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document Summarization · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.9elementary discourse unit filtering · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document SummarizationabstractIn the field of multi-document summarization (MDS), transformerbased models have demonstrated remarkable success, yet they suffer an input length limitation.Current methods apply truncation after the retrieval process to fit the context length; however, they heavily depend on manually well-crafted queries, which are impractical to create for each document set for MDS.Additionally, these methods retrieve information at a coarse granularity, leading to the inclusion of irrelevant content.To address these issues, we propose a novel retrieval-based framework that integrates query selection and document ranking and shortening into a unified process.Our approach identifies the most salient elementary discourse units (EDUs) from input documents and utilizes them as latent queries.These queries guide the document ranking by calculating relevance scores.Instead of traditional truncation, our approach filters out irrelevant EDUs to fit the context length, ensuring that only critical information is preserved for summarization.We evaluate our framework on multiple MDS datasets, demonstrating consistent improvements in ROUGE metrics while confirming its scalability and flexibility across diverse model architectures.Additionally, we validate its effectiveness through an in-depth analysis, emphasizing its ability to dynamically select appropriate queries and accurately rank documents based on their relevance scores.These results demonstrate that our framework effectively addresses context-length constraints, establishing it as a robust and reliable solution for MDS. 1 * Both authors contributed equally to this research. Shiyin Tan, Jaeeon Park, Dongyuan Li, Renhe Jiang, Manabu Okumura |
SIGIR | 2 |