Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haige Zhu

dblp:405/6948 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 75% Information extraction and text analysis · 25%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark
0.912025
Can Large Language Models Help Multimodal Language Analysis? MMLA: A Comprehensive Benchmark · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multimodal language analysis
0.912025
Can Large Language Models Help Multimodal Language Analysis? MMLA: A Comprehensive Benchmark · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Can Large Language Models Help Multimodal Language Analysis? MMLA: A Comprehensive Benchmark · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-shot inference · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Can Large Language Models Help Multimodal Language Analysis? MMLA: A Comprehensive Benchmark
abstract
Multimodal language analysis is a rapidly evolving field that leverages multiple modalities to enhance the understanding of high-level semantics underlying human conversational utterances. Despite its significance, little research has investigated the capability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to comprehend cognitive-level semantics. In this paper, we introduce MMLA, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to address this gap. MMLA comprises over 61K multimodal utterances drawn from both staged and real-world scenarios, covering six core dimensions of multimodal semantics: intent, emotion, dialogue act, sentiment, speaking style, and communication behavior. We evaluate eight mainstream branches of LLMs and MLLMs using three methods: zero-shot inference, supervised fine-tuning, and instruction tuning. Extensive experiments reveal that even fine-tuned models achieve only about 60~70% accuracy, underscoring the limitations of current MLLMs in understanding complex human language. We believe that MMLA will serve as a solid foundation for exploring the potential of large language models in multimodal language analysis and provide valuable resources to advance this field. The datasets and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/thuiar/MMLA.
Hanlei Zhang, Hua Xu 0003, Yeshuang Zhu, Peiwu Wang, Haige Zhu, Jie Zhou 0016, Jinchao Zhang 0001
NeurIPS6