Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Speller

dblp:405/7550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1106-8177ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 77% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference
0.912025
Approximate Lifted Model Construction · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.312025
Approximate Lifted Model Construction · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

factor graph · 0.9color passing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Compression Versus Accuracy: A Hierarchy of Lifted Models
abstract
Probabilistic graphical models that encode indistinguishable objects and relations among them use first-order logic constructs to compress a propositional factorised model for more efficient (lifted) inference. To obtain a lifted representation, the state-of-the-art algorithm Advanced Colour Passing (ACP) groups factors that represent matching distributions. In an approximate version using ε as a hyperparameter, factors are grouped that differ by a factor of at most (1 ± ε). However, finding a suitable ε is not obvious and may need a lot of exploration, possibly requiring many ACP runs with different ε values. Additionally, varying ε can yield wildly different models, leading to decreased interpretability. Therefore, this paper presents a hierarchical approach to lifted model construction that is hyperparameter-free. It efficiently computes a hierarchy of ε values that ensures a hierarchy of models, meaning that once factors are grouped together given some ε, these factors will be grouped together for larger ε as well. The hierarchy of ε values also leads to a hierarchy of error bounds. This allows for explicitly weighing compression versus accuracy when choosing specific ε values to run ACP with and enables interpretability between the different models.
Jan Speller, Malte Luttermann, Marcel Gehrke, Tanya Braun
ECAI1
2025 Approximate Lifted Model Construction
abstract
Probabilistic relational models such as parametric factor graphs enable efficient (lifted) inference by exploiting the indistinguishability of objects. In lifted inference, a representative of indistinguishable objects is used for computations. To obtain a relational (i.e., lifted) representation, the Advanced Colour Passing (ACP) algorithm is the state of the art. The ACP algorithm, however, requires underlying distributions, encoded as potential-based factorisations, to exactly match to identify and exploit indistinguishabilities. Hence, ACP is unsuitable for practical applications where potentials learned from data inevitably deviate even if associated objects are indistinguishable. To mitigate this problem, we introduce the ε-Advanced Colour Passing (ε-ACP) algorithm, which allows for a deviation of potentials depending on a hyperparameter ε. ε-ACP efficiently uncovers and exploits indistinguishabilities that are not exact. We prove that the approximation error induced by ε-ACP is strictly bounded and our experiments show that the approximation error is close to zero in practice.
Malte Luttermann, Jan Speller, Marcel Gehrke, Tanya Braun, Ralf Möller 0001, Mattis Hartwig
IJCAI2