VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
ZiYi Dong
dblp:405/7576
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 12% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI-generated content detection
AI-generated image detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are High-Quality AI-Generated Images More Difficult for Models to Detect? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can We Achieve Efficient Diffusion without Self-Attention? Distilling Self-Attention Into Convolutions · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
efficient diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can We Achieve Efficient Diffusion without Self-Attention? Distilling Self-Attention Into Convolutions · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
robust object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Delving into Cascaded Instability: A Lipschitz Continuity View on Image Restoration and Object Detection Synergy · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distillation
self-attention distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can We Achieve Efficient Diffusion without Self-Attention? Distilling Self-Attention Into Convolutions · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are High-Quality AI-Generated Images More Difficult for Models to Detect? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can We Achieve Efficient Diffusion without Self-Attention? Distilling Self-Attention Into Convolutions · ICCV 2025 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Delving into Cascaded Instability: A Lipschitz Continuity View on Image Restoration and Object Detection Synergy · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lipschitz regularization · 1.7cascaded restoration-detection · 1.7regression analysis · 0.9pyramid convolution · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9clustering · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Can We Achieve Efficient Diffusion without Self-Attention? Distilling Self-Attention Into ConvolutionsabstractContemporary diffusion models built upon U-Net or Diffusion Transformer (DiT) architectures have revolutionized image generation through transformer-based attention mechanisms. The prevailing paradigm has commonly employed self-attention with quadratic computational complexity to handle global spatial relationships in complex images, thereby synthesizing high-fidelity images with coherent visual semantics.Contrary to conventional wisdom, our systematic layer-wise analysis reveals an interesting discrepancy: self-attention in pre-trained diffusion models predominantly exhibits localized attention patterns, closely resembling convolutional inductive biases. This suggests that global interactions in self-attention may be less critical than commonly assumed.Driven by this, we propose \(Δ\)ConvFusion to replace conventional self-attention modules with Pyramid Convolution Blocks (\(Δ\)ConvBlocks).By distilling attention patterns into localized convolutional operations while keeping other components frozen, \(Δ\)ConvFusion achieves performance comparable to transformer-based counterparts while reducing computational cost by 6929$\times$ and surpassing LinFusion by 5.42$\times$ in efficiency--all without compromising generative fidelity. ZiYi Dong, Chengxing Zhou, Weijian Deng, Pengxu Wei, Xiangyang Ji, Liang Lin 0004 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2025 | Are High-Quality AI-Generated Images More Difficult for Models to Detect?abstractThe remarkable evolution of generative models has enabled the generation of high-quality, visually attractive images, often perceptually indistinguishable from real photographs to human eyes. This has spurred significant attention on AI-generated image (AIGI) detection. Intuitively, higher image quality should increase detection difficulty. However, our systematic study on cutting-edge text-to-image generators reveals a counterintuitive finding: AIGIs with higher quality scores, as assessed by human preference models, tend to be more easily detected by existing models. To investigate this, we examine how the text prompts for generation and image characteristics influence both quality scores and detector accuracy. We observe that images from short prompts tend to achieve higher preference scores while being easier to detect. Furthermore, through clustering and regression analyses, we verify that image characteristics like saturation, contrast, and texture richness collectively impact both image quality and detector accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate that the performance of off-the-shelf detectors can be enhanced across diverse generators and datasets by selecting input patches based on the predicted scores of our regression models, thus substantiating the broader applicability of our findings. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Coxy7/AIGI-Detection-Quality-Paradox. Zijie Cao, ZiYi Dong, Xiangyang Ji, Liang Lin 0004, Wei Ke 0003, Pengxu Wei |
ICML | 6 |
| 2025 | Delving into Cascaded Instability: A Lipschitz Continuity View on Image Restoration and Object Detection SynergyabstractTo improve detection robustness in adverse conditions (e.g., haze and low light), image restoration is commonly applied as a pre-processing step to enhance image quality for the detector. However, the functional mismatch between restoration and detection networks can introduce instability and hinder effective integration---an issue that remains underexplored. We revisit this limitation through the lens of Lipschitz continuity, analyzing the functional differences between restoration and detection networks in both the input space and the parameter space. Our analysis shows that restoration networks perform smooth, continuous transformations, while object detectors operate with discontinuous decision boundaries, making them highly sensitive to minor perturbations. This mismatch introduces instability in traditional cascade frameworks, where even imperceptible noise from restoration is amplified during detection, disrupting gradient flow and hindering optimization. To address this, we propose Lipschitz-regularized object detection (LROD), a simple yet effective framework that integrates image restoration directly into the detector’s feature learning, harmonizing the Lipschitz continuity of both tasks during training. We implement this framework as Lipschitz-regularized YOLO (LR-YOLO), extending seamlessly to existing YOLO detectors. Extensive experiments on haze and low-light benchmarks demonstrate that LR-YOLO consistently improves detection stability, optimization smoothness, and overall accuracy. Weijian Deng, Pengxu Wei, ZiYi Dong, Hannan Lu, Xiangyang Ji, Liang Lin 0004 |
NeurIPS | 4 |