Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shenhao Shi
dblp:405/8848
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Privacy and data protection · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
model inversion attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Defending Against Model Inversion Attack via Feature Purification · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack › model inversion attack
model inversion defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Defending Against Model Inversion Attack via Feature Purification · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Defending Against Model Inversion Attack via Feature Purification · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
principal inertia components · 0.9fisher information · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Defending Against Model Inversion Attack via Feature PurificationabstractThe Model Inversion Attack (MIA) aims to reconstruct the privacy data used to train the target model, raising significant public concerns about the privacy of machine learning models. Therefore, proposing effective methods to defend against MIA has become crucial. The relationship between MIA and defense is a typical adversarial process. If the upper bound of the attacker’s capability can be estimated through theoretical analysis, a more robust defense method can be achieved by weakening this upper bound. To achieve this goal, we simplify MIA to a problem of reconstructing estimates, and analyze the lower bound of the reconstruction error obtained by the attacker, from which we infer the theoretical upper bound of the attacker’s capability, providing a foundation for designing the defense mechanism. We find that the lower bound of reconstruction error is inversely proportional to the Fisher information. This means that smaller Fisher information can lead to a larger reconstruction error. If the attacker cannot obtain second-order information during the reconstruction estimation, the corresponding Fisher information will be reduced. Consequently, we propose a defense against model inversion attacks via feature purification (DMIAFP). To reduce the Fisher information, DMIAFP hides the private data contained within the features and its second-order information (the relationships between private data) by minimizing the first-order and second-order correlations between private data and output features. Additionally, we introduce Principal Inertia Components (PIC) for the correlation metric, and infer the theoretical upper bound of the attacker’s reconstruction ability through PIC, thereby avoiding the issue of poor defensive performance caused by data-driven instability in defense methods that train by adversarially inverse models. Experimental results show that our method achieves good performance in defense and exhibits significant advantages in removing redundant information contained in features. Shenhao Shi, Yan Wo |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |