Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Calvin Hillis

dblp:407/4791 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-6514-6915ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
algorithmic bias mitigation
0.912025
Responsible AI Day · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Responsible AI Day · KDD (2) 2025
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving computation
0.912025
Responsible AI Day · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI governance
0.312025
Responsible AI Day · KDD (2) 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AI ethics education: A scoping review of pedagogy, curriculum, and assessment
abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in social and institutional decision-making, creating demand for ethically literate practitioners. Universities have responded by introducing AI ethics instruction, but the structure, content, pedagogy, and evaluation of these efforts remain unevenly documented. Objective To map and synthesize research on university level AI ethics education by characterizing course design, pedagogy, ethical themes, and assessment methods, and identifying evidence gaps that limit knowledge consolidation and instructional refinement. Methods We conducted a scoping review using Continuous Active Learning to screen 50,766 records up to 2024. 43 studies met inclusion after title, abstract, and full text review. We coded instructional design, curricular themes, pedagogical methods, and evaluation approaches using descriptive frequency counts and qualitative synthesis. Results Most included studies were conceptual or descriptive, with relatively few empirical evaluations. Instruction was concentrated in computing and engineering and primarily targeted undergraduate learners. Ethics content was more often embedded within technical courses than delivered as standalone offerings. Reported pedagogy relied heavily on lecture and case-based discussion, with fewer studies describing participatory formats such as simulations or role-play. Curricular emphasis clustered around bias/fairness and privacy, with comparatively less attention to governance, explainability, and trust. Evaluation most often relied on self-report and reflective methods, while validated instruments and performance-based assessments were less common, and behavioral or applied outcomes were rarely assessed. Conclusions The literature suggests a field oriented toward awareness-building more than measurable ethical competence. Clearer competency claims, stronger assessment transparency, and greater alignment between instructional design and evaluation would improve comparability across studies and support evidence-informed course development.
Calvin Hillis, Maushumi Bhattacharjee, Batool AlMousawi, Riley Martens, Tarik Eltanahy, Sara Ono, Marcus Hui, Ba' Pham, Michelle Swab, Gordon V. Cormack, Maura R. Grossman, Ebrahim Bagheri, Zack Marshall
Inf. Process. Manag.1
2025 Responsible AI Day
abstract
This special day event on Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) brings together researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to explore how data mining and machine learning systems can be designed to align with ethical principles, societal values, and human well-being. As AI technologies increasingly influence decisions in healthcare, finance, governance, and social systems, there is a critical need to develop frameworks that embed fairness, accountability, and privacy directly into the foundations of knowledge discovery. This full-day event will feature a mix of invited talks, interactive debates, expert panels, and peer-reviewed research presentations, all focused on the practical integration of ethical design into data-driven systems. The Responsible AI Day builds on the success of Canada's NSERC CREATE Program on Responsible AI, an interdisciplinary initiative training the next generation of AI researchers across computer science, law, bioethics, public health, and media studies. Topics will span scalable AI governance, privacy-preserving computation, algorithmic bias mitigation, and the socio-legal tensions emerging in generative AI. By positioning responsible AI as a sociotechnical challenge, this special day aligns with KDD's mission of advancing data science that is not only technically robust but also socially conscious.
Ebrahim Bagheri, Faezeh Ensan, Calvin Hillis, Reihaneh Rabbany, Robin Cohen, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Sébastien Gambs
KDD (2)3