Christopher Priebe

dblp:407/8572 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-4028-6448ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 67% Storage systems · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
compiler optimization
0.912025
REASONING COMPILER: LLM-Guided Optimizations for Efficient Model Serving · NeurIPS 2025
Storage systems › computational storage
in-storage computing
0.912025
In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service · ISCA 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › accelerator integration
near-storage accelerator
0.912025
In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service · ISCA 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.312025
REASONING COMPILER: LLM-Guided Optimizations for Efficient Model Serving · NeurIPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
query embedding
0.312025
In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service · ISCA 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312025
In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service · ISCA 2025
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.312025
In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service · ISCA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metamorphic architecture · 2.6in-storage processing · 2.6monte carlo tree search · 1.7large language model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 In-Storage Acceleration of Retrieval Augmented Generation as a Service
abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) services are rapidly gaining adoption in enterprise settings as they combine information retrieval systems (e.g., databases) with large language models (LLMs) to enhance response generation and reduce hallucinations.By augmenting an LLM's fixed pre-trained knowledge with real-time information retrieval, RAG enables models to effectively extend their context to large knowledge bases by selectively retrieving only the most relevant information.As a result, RAG provides the effect of dynamic updates to the LLM's knowledge without requiring expensive and time-consuming retraining.While some deployments keep the entire database in memory, RAG services are increasingly shifting toward persistent storage to accommodate ever-growing knowledge bases, enhance utility, and improve cost-efficiency.However, this transition fundamentally reshapes the system's performance profile: empirical analysis reveals that the Search & Retrieval phase emerges as the dominant contributor to end-to-end latency.This phase typically involves (1) running a smaller language model to generate query embeddings, (2) executing similarity and relevance checks over varying data structures, and (3) performing frequent, long-latency accesses to persistent storage.To address this triad of challenges, we propose a metamorphic in-storage accelerator architecture that provides the necessary programmability to support diverse RAG algorithms, dynamic data structures, and varying computational patterns.The architecture also supports in-storage execution of smaller language models for query embedding generation while final LLM generation is executed on DGX A100 systems.Experimental results show up to 4.3× and 1.5× improvement in end-to-end throughput compared to conventional retrieval pipelines using Xeon CPUs with NVMe storage and A100 GPUs with DRAM, respectively.
Rohan Mahapatra, Harsha Santhanam, Christopher Priebe, Hanyang Xu 0002, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh
ISCA3
2025 REASONING COMPILER: LLM-Guided Optimizations for Efficient Model Serving
abstract
While model serving has unlocked unprecedented capabilities, the high cost of serving large-scale models continues to be a significant barrier to widespread accessibility and rapid innovation. Compiler optimizations have long driven substantial performance improvements, but existing compilers struggle with neural workloads due to the exponentially large and highly interdependent space of possible transformations. Although existing stochastic search techniques can be effective, they are often sample-inefficient and fail to leverage the structural context underlying compilation decisions. We set out to investigate the research question of whether reasoning with large language models (LLMs), without any retraining, can leverage the context-aware decision space of compiler optimizations to significantly improve sample efficiency. To that end, we introduce a novel compilation framework (dubbed REASONING COMPILER) that formulates optimization as a sequential, context-aware decision process guided by a large language model and structured Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS). The LLM acts as a proposal mechanism, suggesting hardware-informed transformations that reflect the current program state and accumulated performance feedback. MCTS incorporates the LLM-generated proposals to balance exploration and exploitation, facilitating a structured, context-sensitive traversal of the expansive compiler optimization space. By achieving substantial speedups with markedly fewer samples than leading neural compilers, our approach demonstrates the potential of LLM-guided reasoning to transform the landscape of compiler optimization.
Annabelle Sujun Tang, Christopher Priebe, Rohan Mahapatra, Lianhui Qin, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh
NeurIPS2