Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yash

dblp:407/8999 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-6159-4387ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification
0.912025
Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › structured bandit
clustering of bandits
0.912025
Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
multi-agent bandit
0.912025
Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.912025
Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

successive elimination · 0.9clustering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits
abstract
This work investigates the problem of best arm identification for multi-agent multi-armed bandits. We consider $N$ agents grouped into $M$ clusters, where each cluster solves a stochastic bandit problem. The mapping between agents and bandits is \textit{a priori} unknown. Each bandit is associated with $K$ arms, and the goal is to identify the best arm for each agent under a $\delta$-probably correct ($\delta$-PC) framework, while minimizing sample complexity and communication overhead. We propose two novel algorithms: \emph{Clustering then Best Arm Identification} (\texttt{Cl-BAI}) and \emph{Best Arm Identification then Clustering} (\texttt{BAI-Cl}). \texttt{Cl-BAI} employs a two-phase approach that first clusters agents based on the bandit problems they are learning, followed by identifying the best arm for each cluster. \texttt{BAI-Cl} reverses the sequence by identifying the best arms first and then clustering agents accordingly. Both algorithms exploit the successive elimination framework to ensure computational efficiency and high accuracy. Theoretical analysis establishes $\delta$-PC guarantees for both methods, derives bounds on their sample complexity, and provides a lower bound for the problem class. Moreover, when $M$ is small (a constant), we show that the sample complexity of (a variant of) \texttt{BAI-Cl} is (order-wise) minimax optimal. Experiments on synthetic and real-world (Movie Lens, Yelp) data demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed algorithms in terms of sample and communication efficiency, particularly in settings where $M \ll N$.
Yash, Avishek Ghosh, Nikhil Karamchandani
ICML1
2025 Brain-lateralized reservoirs: Neuro-anatomically constrained echo state networks for chaotic and physiological signals
Shreyas Rajesh Dahale, Yash, Balasubramanian Raman
Knowl. Based Syst.3