Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Wenzel
dblp:407/9008
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning environment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward shaping · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production LinesabstractMany production lines require active control mechanisms, such as adaptive routing, worker reallocation, and rescheduling, to maintain optimal performance. However, designing these control systems is challenging for various reasons, and while reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promise in addressing these challenges, a standardized and general framework is still lacking. In this work, we introduce LineFlow, an extensible, open-source Python framework for simulating production lines of arbitrary complexity and training RL agents to control them. To demonstrate the capabilities and to validate the underlying theoretical assumptions of LineFlow, we formulate core subproblems of active line control in ways that facilitate mathematical analysis. For each problem, we provide optimal solutions for comparison. We benchmark state-of-the-art RL algorithms and show that the learned policies approach optimal performance in well-understood scenarios. However, for more complex, industrial-scale production lines, RL still faces significant challenges, highlighting the need for further research in areas such as reward shaping, curriculum learning, and hierarchical control. Kai Müller, Martin Wenzel, Tobias Windisch |
ICML | 2 |