Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shira Vansover-Hager

dblp:407/9609 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 60% Learning theory · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.912025
Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › optimization theory
multi-pass SGD
0.912025
Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
overfitting
0.912025
Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
stochastic convex optimization
0.912025
Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.912025
Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Rapid Overfitting of Multi-Pass SGD in Stochastic Convex Optimization
abstract
We study the out-of-sample performance of multi-pass stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in the fundamental stochastic convex optimization (SCO) model. While one-pass SGD is known to achieve an optimal $\Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$ excess population loss given a sample of size $n$, much less is understood about the multi-pass version of the algorithm which is widely used in practice. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that in the general non-smooth case of SCO, just a few epochs of SGD can already hurt its out-of-sample performance significantly and lead to overfitting. In particular, using a step size $\eta = \Theta(1/\sqrt{n})$, which gives the optimal rate after one pass, can lead to population loss as large as $\Omega(1)$ after just one additional pass. More generally, we show that the population loss from the second pass onward is of the order $\Theta(1/(\eta T) + \eta \sqrt{T})$, where $T$ is the total number of steps. These results reveal a certain phase-transition in the out-of-sample behavior of SGD after the first epoch, as well as a sharp separation between the rates of overfitting in the smooth and non-smooth cases of SCO. Additionally, we extend our results to with-replacement SGD, proving that the same asymptotic bounds hold after $O(n \log n)$ steps. Finally, we also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(\eta \sqrt{n})$ on the generalization gap of one-pass SGD in dimension $d = {\widetilde O}(n)$, improving on recent results of Koren et al. (2022) and Schliserman et al. (2024).
Shira Vansover-Hager, Tomer Koren, Roi Livni
ICML1