Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jixi He
dblp:408/4165
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? - Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
physical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? - Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? - Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal model · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? - Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics ReasoningabstractWe present SeePhys, a large-scale multimodal benchmark for LLM reasoning grounded in physics questions ranging from middle school to PhD qualifying exams. The benchmark covers 7 fundamental domains spanning the physics discipline, incorporating 21 categories of highly heterogeneous diagrams. In contrast to prior works where visual elements mainly serve auxiliary purposes, our benchmark features a substantial proportion of vision-essential problems (75%) that mandate visual information extraction for correct solutions. Through extensive evaluation, we observe that even the most advanced visual reasoning models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-pro and o4-mini) achieve sub-60% accuracy on our benchmark. These results reveal fundamental challenges in current large language models' visual understanding capabilities, particularly in: (i) establishing rigorous coupling between diagram interpretation and physics reasoning, and (ii) overcoming their persistent reliance on textual cues as cognitive shortcuts.Project Page: github.com/SeePhys/seephys-projectHugging Face: huggingface.co/datasets/SeePhys/SeePhys Kun Xiang, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Yinya Huang, Zirong Liu, Peixin Qu, Jixi He, Yu-Jie Yuan, Jianhua Han, Hang Xu 0004, Mrinmaya Sachan, Xiaodan Liang |
NeurIPS | 7 |