Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jidong Hu

dblp:409/0413 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 44% Program synthesis and code generation · 44% Program analysis · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software documentation
code comment consistency
0.912025
Code Comment Inconsistency Detection and Rectification Using a Large Language Model · ICSE 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.912025
Code Comment Inconsistency Detection and Rectification Using a Large Language Model · ICSE 2025
Program analysis
static analysis
0.312025
Code Comment Inconsistency Detection and Rectification Using a Large Language Model · ICSE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Code Comment Inconsistency Detection and Rectification Using a Large Language Model
abstract
Comments are widely used in source code. If a comment is consistent with the code snippet it intends to annotate, it would aid code comprehension. Otherwise, Code Comment Inconsistency (CCI) is not only detrimental to the understanding of code, but more importantly, it would negatively impact the development, testing, and maintenance of software. To tackle this issue, existing research has been primarily focused on detecting inconsistencies with varied performance. It is evident that detection alone does not solve the problem; it merely paves the way for solving it. A complete solution requires detecting inconsistencies and, more importantly, rectifying them by amending comments. However, this type of work is scarce. In this paper, we contribute C4RLLaMA, a fine-tuned large language model based on the open-source CodeLLaMA. It not only has the ability to rectify inconsistencies by correcting relevant comment content but also outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in detecting inconsistencies. Experiments with various datasets confirm that C4RLLaMA consistently surpasses both post hoc and just-in-time CCI detection approaches. More importantly, C4RLLaMA outperforms substantially the only known CCI rectification approach in terms of multiple performance metrics. To further examine C4RLLaMA's efficacy in rectifying inconsistencies, we conducted a manual evaluation, and the results showed that the percentage of correct comment updates by C4RLLaMA was 65.0% and 55.9% in just-in-time and post hoc, respectively, implying C4RLLaMA's real potential in practical use.
Guoping Rong, Yongda Yu, Haifeng Shen, Jidong Hu
ICSE7