Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Conti

dblp:409/1346 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
contextual document embedding
0.912025
Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.912025
Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark
0.912025
Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.912025
Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

late chunking pooling · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings
abstract
A limitation of modern document retrieval embedding methods is that they typically encode passages (chunks) from the same documents independently, often overlooking crucial contextual information from the rest of the document that could greatly improve individual chunk representations.In this work, we introduce ConTEB (Contextaware Text Embedding Benchmark), a benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval models on their ability to leverage document-wide context.Our results show that state-of-the-art embedding models struggle in retrieval scenarios where context is required.To address this limitation, we propose InSeNT (In-sequence Negative Training), a novel contrastive posttraining approach which combined with late chunking pooling enhances contextual representation learning while preserving computational efficiency.Our method significantly improves retrieval quality on ConTEB without sacrificing base model performance.We further find chunks embedded with our method are more robust to suboptimal chunking strategies and larger retrieval corpus sizes.We opensource all artifacts at https://github.com/ illuin-tech/contextual-embeddings.
Max Conti, Manuel Faysse, Gautier Viaud, Antoine Bosselut, Céline Hudelot, Pierre Colombo
EMNLP1