Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Max Conti
dblp:409/1346
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
contextual document embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
document retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document Embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
late chunking pooling · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Context is Gold to find the Gold Passage: Evaluating and Training Contextual Document EmbeddingsabstractA limitation of modern document retrieval embedding methods is that they typically encode passages (chunks) from the same documents independently, often overlooking crucial contextual information from the rest of the document that could greatly improve individual chunk representations.In this work, we introduce ConTEB (Contextaware Text Embedding Benchmark), a benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval models on their ability to leverage document-wide context.Our results show that state-of-the-art embedding models struggle in retrieval scenarios where context is required.To address this limitation, we propose InSeNT (In-sequence Negative Training), a novel contrastive posttraining approach which combined with late chunking pooling enhances contextual representation learning while preserving computational efficiency.Our method significantly improves retrieval quality on ConTEB without sacrificing base model performance.We further find chunks embedded with our method are more robust to suboptimal chunking strategies and larger retrieval corpus sizes.We opensource all artifacts at https://github.com/ illuin-tech/contextual-embeddings. Max Conti, Manuel Faysse, Gautier Viaud, Antoine Bosselut, Céline Hudelot, Pierre Colombo |
EMNLP | 1 |