Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junru Zhao
dblp:409/8000
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 38% Learning theory · 38% Segmentation and scene understanding · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-stage pre-training · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive LearningabstractDavid Marr's seminal theory of human perception stipulates that visual processing is a multi-stage process, prioritizing the derivation of boundary and surface properties before forming semantic object representations. In contrast, contrastive representation learning frameworks typically bypass this explicit multi-stage approach, defining their objective as the direct learning of a semantic representation space for objects. While effective in general contexts, this approach sacrifices the inductive biases of vision, leading to slower convergence speed and learning shortcut resulting in texture bias. In this work, we demonstrate that leveraging Marr's multi-stage theory-by first constructing boundary and surface-level representations using perceptual constructs from early visual processing stages and subsequently training for object semantics-leads to 2x faster convergence on ResNet18, improved final representations on semantic segmentation, depth estimation, and object recognition, and enhanced robustness and out-of-distribution capability. Together, we propose a pretraining stage before the general contrastive representation pretraining to further enhance the final representation quality and reduce the overall convergence time via inductive bias from human vision systems. Junru Zhao, Tianqin Li, Dunhan Jiang, Shenghao Wu, Alan Ramirez, Tai Sing Lee |
CVPR | 1 |