Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji

dblp:409/8326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model › tool-augmented language models
function calling
0.912025
The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool use
0.912025
The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

abstract syntax tree evaluation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models
abstract
Function calling, also called tool use, refers to an LLM’s ability to invoke external functions, APIs, or user-defined tools in response to user queries—an essential capability for agentic LLM applications. Despite its prominence, there did not exist a standard benchmark to evaluate function calling abilities, due to two reasons – the challenging nature of evaluating when a function call is valid, and the challenge of acquiring diverse, real-world functions. We present the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate function calling capabilities in a wide range of real-world settings. The BFCL benchmark evaluates serial and parallel function calls, across various programming languages using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method that can easily scale to thousands of functions. We construct the benchmark using a combination of expert curated, and user-contributed functions and associated prompts. Finally, BFCL benchmark evaluates the ability of models to abstain and reason in stateful multi-step agentic setting. Evaluating a wide range of models, we observe that while state-of-the-art LLMs excel at singleturn calls, memory, dynamic decision-making, and long-horizon reasoning remain open challenges. Since its preview, BFCL has become the defacto standard for evaluating function-calls, and can be accessed at gorilla.cs.berkeley.edu/leaderboard.html.
Shishir G. Patil, Huanzhi Mao, Fanjia Yan, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, Vishnu Suresh, Ion Stoica, Joseph Gonzalez 0001
ICML4