VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji
dblp:409/8326
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model › tool-augmented language models
function calling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool use |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
abstract syntax tree evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language ModelsabstractFunction calling, also called tool use, refers to an LLM’s ability to invoke external functions, APIs, or user-defined tools in response to user queries—an essential capability for agentic LLM applications. Despite its prominence, there did not exist a standard benchmark to evaluate function calling abilities, due to two reasons – the challenging nature of evaluating when a function call is valid, and the challenge of acquiring diverse, real-world functions. We present the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate function calling capabilities in a wide range of real-world settings. The BFCL benchmark evaluates serial and parallel function calls, across various programming languages using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method that can easily scale to thousands of functions. We construct the benchmark using a combination of expert curated, and user-contributed functions and associated prompts. Finally, BFCL benchmark evaluates the ability of models to abstain and reason in stateful multi-step agentic setting. Evaluating a wide range of models, we observe that while state-of-the-art LLMs excel at singleturn calls, memory, dynamic decision-making, and long-horizon reasoning remain open challenges. Since its preview, BFCL has become the defacto standard for evaluating function-calls, and can be accessed at gorilla.cs.berkeley.edu/leaderboard.html. Shishir G. Patil, Huanzhi Mao, Fanjia Yan, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, Vishnu Suresh, Ion Stoica, Joseph Gonzalez 0001 |
ICML | 4 |