Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zegang Sun

dblp:409/8586 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 93% Cloud and datacenter computing · 7%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
consensus
1.922026
Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026
GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025
Distributed systems › consensus
geo-distributed consensus
1.922026
Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026
GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
geo-distributed systems
0.312025
GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility modeling · 1.0log pre-synchronization · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and Implementation
abstract
Geo-distributed consensus protocols underpin modern databases across multiple data centers, yet their performance critically depends on effective leader management under wide-area network (WAN) dynamics. Legacy approaches fall short as they either ignore application-level factors or incur high switching overheads. This paper presents GeoLM, a lightweight, performance-oriented leader management framework. GeoLM formalizes a utility model that jointly captures network delays, node popularity, and read-write ratios, and integrates three mechanisms: (i) Target Selection to identify promising leaders, (ii) Switching Damping to bound oscillations and ensure stable leadership, and (iii) Leader Handover with log pre-synchronization to minimize downtime. GeoLM is implemented in ETCD-Raft and seamlessly extends existing protocols without altering log replication. Comprehensive evaluation-including trace-driven simulations with AWS latency traces and real-world deployments across multiple regions-demonstrates that GeoLM reduces average latency by up to 30.77%, tail latency by up to 49.75%, and improves throughput by up to 28% over baseline protocols (depending on the comparison). GeoLM further delivers consistently better performance than state-of-the-art protocols such as SwiftPaxos, CURP, and EPaxos, while maintaining strong consistency guarantees.
Duling Xu, Tong Li 0014, Yunpeng Chai, Zegang Sun, Wei Lu 0015, Xiaoyong Du 0001
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.5
2025 GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol
Duling Xu, Tong Li 0014, Yunpeng Chai, Zegang Sun, Yangfan Liu, Wei Lu 0015, Xiaoyong Du 0001
INFOCOM5