Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zegang Sun
dblp:409/8586
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 93% Cloud and datacenter computing · 7% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025 |
Distributed systems › consensus
geo-distributed consensus |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
geo-distributed systems |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol · INFOCOM 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
utility modeling · 1.0log pre-synchronization · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Geo-Distributed Leader Management of Consensus Protocol: Modeling, Analysis, and ImplementationabstractGeo-distributed consensus protocols underpin modern databases across multiple data centers, yet their performance critically depends on effective leader management under wide-area network (WAN) dynamics. Legacy approaches fall short as they either ignore application-level factors or incur high switching overheads. This paper presents GeoLM, a lightweight, performance-oriented leader management framework. GeoLM formalizes a utility model that jointly captures network delays, node popularity, and read-write ratios, and integrates three mechanisms: (i) Target Selection to identify promising leaders, (ii) Switching Damping to bound oscillations and ensure stable leadership, and (iii) Leader Handover with log pre-synchronization to minimize downtime. GeoLM is implemented in ETCD-Raft and seamlessly extends existing protocols without altering log replication. Comprehensive evaluation-including trace-driven simulations with AWS latency traces and real-world deployments across multiple regions-demonstrates that GeoLM reduces average latency by up to 30.77%, tail latency by up to 49.75%, and improves throughput by up to 28% over baseline protocols (depending on the comparison). GeoLM further delivers consistently better performance than state-of-the-art protocols such as SwiftPaxos, CURP, and EPaxos, while maintaining strong consistency guarantees. Duling Xu, Tong Li 0014, Yunpeng Chai, Zegang Sun, Wei Lu 0015, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 5 |
| 2025 | GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus Protocol
Duling Xu, Tong Li 0014, Yunpeng Chai, Zegang Sun, Yangfan Liu, Wei Lu 0015, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
INFOCOM | 5 |