Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florian Handke

dblp:409/9462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.722025
Entropic Time Schedulers for Generative Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Feedback Guidance of Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation
0.912025
Feedback Guidance of Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
noise scheduling
0.912025
Entropic Time Schedulers for Generative Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.312025
Feedback Guidance of Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feedback guidance · 0.9entropy-based scheduling · 0.9classifier-free guidance · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Feedback Guidance of Diffusion Models
abstract
While Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) has become standard for improving sample fidelity in conditional diffusion models, it can harm diversity and induce memorization by applying constant guidance regardless of whether a particular sample needs correction. We propose **F**eed**B**ack **G**uidance (FBG), which uses a state-dependent coefficient to self-regulate guidance amounts based on need. Our approach is derived from first principles by assuming the learned conditional distribution is linearly corrupted by the unconditional distribution, contrasting with CFG's implicit multiplicative assumption. Our scheme relies on feedback of its own predictions about the conditional signal informativeness to adapt guidance dynamically during inference, challenging the view of guidance as a fixed hyperparameter. The approach is benchmarked on ImageNet512x512, where it significantly outperforms Classifier-Free Guidance and is competitive to Limited Interval Guidance (LIG) while benefitting from a strong mathematical framework. On Text-To-Image generation, we demonstrate that, as anticipated, our approach automatically applies higher guidance scales for complex prompts than for simpler ones and that it can be easily combined with existing guidance schemes such as CFG or LIG.
Felix Koulischer, Florian Handke, Johannes Deleu, Thomas Demeester, Luca Ambrogioni
NeurIPS2
2025 Entropic Time Schedulers for Generative Diffusion Models
abstract
The practical performance of generative diffusion models depends on the appropriate choice of the noise scheduling function, which can also be equivalently expressed as a time reparameterization. In this paper, we present a time scheduler that selects sampling points based on entropy rather than uniform time spacing, ensuring that each point contributes an equal amount of information to the final generation. We prove that this time reparameterization does not depend on the initial choice of time. Furthermore, we provide a tractable exact formula to estimate this \emph{entropic time} for a trained model using the training loss without substantial overhead. Alongside the entropic time, inspired by the optimality results, we introduce a rescaled entropic time. In our experiments with mixtures of Gaussian distributions and ImageNet, we show that using the (rescaled) entropic times greatly improves the inference performance of trained models. In particular, we found that the image quality in pretrained EDM2 models, as evaluated by FID and FD-DINO scores, can be substantially increased by the rescaled entropic time reparameterization without increasing the number of function evaluations, with greater improvements in the few NFEs regime. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/DejanStancevic/Entropic-Time-Schedulers-for-Generative-Diffusion-Models}.
Dejan Stancevic, Florian Handke, Luca Ambrogioni
NeurIPS2