VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stuart W. Chalmers
dblp:41/2857
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-5874-5019ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › sensor network management
sensor network resource management |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation
generalized assignment problem |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.2greedy heuristic · 0.2distributed heuristic · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained EnvironmentsabstractWhen a sensor network is deployed in the field it is typically required to support multiple simultaneous missions, which may start and finish at different times. Schemes that match sensor resources to mission demands thus become necessary. In this paper, we consider new sensor-assignment problems motivated by frugality, i.e., the conservation of resources, for both static and dynamic settings. In the most general setting, the problems we study are NP-hard even to approximate, and so we focus on heuristic algorithms that perform well in practice. In the static setting, we propose a greedy centralized solution and a more sophisticated solution that uses the Generalized Assignment Problem model and can be implemented in a distributed fashion. In what we call the dynamic setting, missions arrive over time and have different durations. For this setting, we give heuristic algorithms in which available sensors propose to nearby missions as they arrive. We find that the overall performance can be significantly improved if available sensors sometimes refuse to offer utility to missions they could help, making this decision based on the value of the mission, the sensor's remaining energy, and (if known) the remaining target lifetime of the network. Finally, we evaluate our solutions through simulations. Matthew P. Johnson 0001, Hosam Rowaihy, Diego Pizzocaro, Amotz Bar-Noy, Stuart W. Chalmers, Thomas La Porta, Alun D. Preece |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 5 |
| 2008 | Frugal Sensor Assignment
Matthew P. Johnson 0001, Hosam Rowaihy, Diego Pizzocaro, Amotz Bar-Noy, Stuart W. Chalmers, Thomas La Porta, Alun D. Preece |
DCOSS | 5 |
| 2007 | A reusable commitment management service using Semantic Web technology
Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Craig McKenzie |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2006 | A semantic web approach to handling soft constraints in virtual organisationsabstractIn this paper we present a proposal for representing soft constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) within the Semantic Web architecture. The proposal is motivated by the need for a service-providing agent in a virtual organisation to reason about its commitments as soft constraints. The three essential requirements addressed are: (1) the need to have constraints express commitments in terms of Semantic Web services, (2) the need to associate utility values with constraints, to reflect the relative importance of satisfying them, and (3) the need to make statements about which constraints are satisfied and violated by a given solution. The proposal builds upon previous work in defining a Semantic Web Constraint Interchange Format (CIF), which itself builds on the proposed Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL). The paper describes an ontology for representing soft CSPs and their solutions, allowing an agent’s set of commitments to be expressed as a collection of soft constraints. The ontology is an open interchange format for soft CSPs, allowing commitment to be communicated and exchanged among the members of a virtual organisation. 1. Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Craig McKenzie, Jeff Z. Pan, Peter M. D. Gray |
ICEC | 2 |
| 2006 | Assisting Domain Experts to Formulate and Solve Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Derek H. Sleeman, Stuart W. Chalmers |
EKAW | 2 |
| 2004 | Agent-based formation of virtual organisations
Timothy J. Norman, Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Nicholas R. Jennings, Michael Luck, Viet Dung Dang, Thuc Duong Nguyen, Vikas Deora, Jianhua Shao 0001, W. Alex Gray, Nick J. Fiddian |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |