Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Stuart W. Chalmers

dblp:41/2857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-5874-5019ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › sensor network management
sensor network resource management
0.112010
Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.012010
Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation
generalized assignment problem
0.012010
Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2greedy heuristic · 0.2distributed heuristic · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Sensor-Mission Assignment in Constrained Environments
abstract
When a sensor network is deployed in the field it is typically required to support multiple simultaneous missions, which may start and finish at different times. Schemes that match sensor resources to mission demands thus become necessary. In this paper, we consider new sensor-assignment problems motivated by frugality, i.e., the conservation of resources, for both static and dynamic settings. In the most general setting, the problems we study are NP-hard even to approximate, and so we focus on heuristic algorithms that perform well in practice. In the static setting, we propose a greedy centralized solution and a more sophisticated solution that uses the Generalized Assignment Problem model and can be implemented in a distributed fashion. In what we call the dynamic setting, missions arrive over time and have different durations. For this setting, we give heuristic algorithms in which available sensors propose to nearby missions as they arrive. We find that the overall performance can be significantly improved if available sensors sometimes refuse to offer utility to missions they could help, making this decision based on the value of the mission, the sensor's remaining energy, and (if known) the remaining target lifetime of the network. Finally, we evaluate our solutions through simulations.
Matthew P. Johnson 0001, Hosam Rowaihy, Diego Pizzocaro, Amotz Bar-Noy, Stuart W. Chalmers, Thomas La Porta, Alun D. Preece
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.5
2008 Frugal Sensor Assignment
Matthew P. Johnson 0001, Hosam Rowaihy, Diego Pizzocaro, Amotz Bar-Noy, Stuart W. Chalmers, Thomas La Porta, Alun D. Preece
DCOSS5
2007 A reusable commitment management service using Semantic Web technology
Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Craig McKenzie
Knowl. Based Syst.2
2006 A semantic web approach to handling soft constraints in virtual organisations
abstract
In this paper we present a proposal for representing soft constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) within the Semantic Web architecture. The proposal is motivated by the need for a service-providing agent in a virtual organisation to reason about its commitments as soft constraints. The three essential requirements addressed are: (1) the need to have constraints express commitments in terms of Semantic Web services, (2) the need to associate utility values with constraints, to reflect the relative importance of satisfying them, and (3) the need to make statements about which constraints are satisfied and violated by a given solution. The proposal builds upon previous work in defining a Semantic Web Constraint Interchange Format (CIF), which itself builds on the proposed Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL). The paper describes an ontology for representing soft CSPs and their solutions, allowing an agent’s set of commitments to be expressed as a collection of soft constraints. The ontology is an open interchange format for soft CSPs, allowing commitment to be communicated and exchanged among the members of a virtual organisation. 1.
Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Craig McKenzie, Jeff Z. Pan, Peter M. D. Gray
ICEC2
2006 Assisting Domain Experts to Formulate and Solve Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Derek H. Sleeman, Stuart W. Chalmers
EKAW2
2004 Agent-based formation of virtual organisations
Timothy J. Norman, Alun D. Preece, Stuart W. Chalmers, Nicholas R. Jennings, Michael Luck, Viet Dung Dang, Thuc Duong Nguyen, Vikas Deora, Jianhua Shao 0001, W. Alex Gray, Nick J. Fiddian
Knowl. Based Syst.3