Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emmanuel Marchand
dblp:41/4782
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-6984-0291ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 67% Information retrieval · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilingual Evaluation of Main Content Extractors for Web Pages · SIGIR 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction › web data extraction
main content extraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilingual Evaluation of Main Content Extractors for Web Pages · SIGIR 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction
web data extraction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilingual Evaluation of Main Content Extractors for Web Pages · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark reproduction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multilingual Evaluation of Main Content Extractors for Web PagesabstractTools designed to extract main content from web pages require thorough evaluation, yet existing benchmarks disproportionately focus on English-language datasets. Consequently, previous studies have shown that while these extractors are well-optimized for English, their effectiveness partially or entirely diminishes in other languages. This study reproduces and extends recent benchmarks by incorporating multilingual datasets as a key factor. We analyze extractor performance across five languages-Greek, English, Polish, Russian, and Chinese-highlighting the need to adapt extraction models to linguistic variations. Our results show that while some extractors maintain stable performance, others suffer significant drops in precision and recall on non-English or structurally irregular pages. Aurélien Bournonville, Gaël Dias, Thomas Largillier, Emmanuel Marchand, Fabrice Maurel, Guillaume Pitel, François Rioult |
SIGIR | 4 |