Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Celina Santamaría

dblp:41/5124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 87% Web and social media mining · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112010
Wikipedia as Sense Inventory to Improve Diversity in Web Search Results · ACL 2010
Information retrieval
search result diversification
0.112010
Wikipedia as Sense Inventory to Improve Diversity in Web Search Results · ACL 2010
Web and social media mining › user-generated content
wikipedia
0.012010
Wikipedia as Sense Inventory to Improve Diversity in Web Search Results · ACL 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sense inventory construction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Wikipedia as Sense Inventory to Improve Diversity in Web Search Results
Celina Santamaría, Julio Gonzalo 0001, Javier Artiles
ACL1
2003 Automatic Association of Web Directories to Word Senses
abstract
We describe an algorithm that combines lexical information (from WordNet 1.7) with Web directories (from the Open Directory Project) to associate word senses with such directories. Such associations can be used as rich characterizations to acquire sense-tagged corpora automatically, cluster topically related senses, and detect sense specializations. The algorithm is evaluated for the 29 nouns (147 senses) used in the Senseval 2 competition, obtaining 148 (word sense, Web directory) associations covering 88% of the domain-specific word senses in the test data with 86% accuracy. The richness of Web directories as sense characterizations is evaluated in a supervised word sense disambiguation task using the Senseval 2 test suite. The results indicate that, when the directory/word sense association is correct, the samples automatically acquired from the Web directories are nearly as valid for training as the original Senseval 2 training instances. The results support our hypothesis that Web directories are a rich source of lexical information: cleaner, more reliable, and more structured than the full Web as a corpus.
Celina Santamaría, Julio Gonzalo 0001, M. Felisa Verdejo
Comput. Linguistics1