Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Fatima M. Felisberti

dblp:41/6263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-8703-4400ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 61% Generative modeling · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.112008
Tied Factor Analysis for Face Recognition across Large Pose Differences · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Machine learning › Generative modeling › face synthesis
generative face model
0.112008
Tied Factor Analysis for Face Recognition across Large Pose Differences · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
pose-invariant face recognition
0.112008
Tied Factor Analysis for Face Recognition across Large Pose Differences · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
factor analysis
0.012008
Tied Factor Analysis for Face Recognition across Large Pose Differences · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tied factor analysis · 0.1probabilistic distance metric · 0.1EM algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Congruency Effect Between Articulation and Grasping in Native English Speakers
abstract
Previous studies have shown congruency effects between specific speech articulations and manual grasping actions. For example, uttering the syllable [kα] facilitates power grip responses in terms of reaction time and response accuracy. A similar association of the syllable [ti] with precision grip has also been observed. As these congruency effects have been to date shown only for Finnish native speakers, this study explored whether the congruency effects generalize to native speakers of another language. The original experiments were therefore replicated with English participants (N=16). Several previous findings were reproduced, namely the association of syllables [kα] and [ke] with power grip and of [ti] and [te] with precision grip. However, the association of vowels [α] and [i] with power and precision grip, respectively, previously found for Finnish participants, was not significant for English speakers. This difference could be related to ambiguities of English orthography and pronunciation variations. It is possible that for English speakers seeing a certain written vowel activates several different phonological representations associated with that letter. If the congruency effects are based on interactions between specific phonological representations and grasp actions, this ambiguity might lead to weakening of the effects in the manner demonstrated here.
Mikko Tiainen, Fatima M. Felisberti, Kaisa Tiippana, Martti Vainio, Juraj Simko, Jirí Lukavský, Lari Vainio
INTERSPEECH2
2008 Tied Factor Analysis for Face Recognition across Large Pose Differences
abstract
Face recognition algorithms perform very unreliably when the pose of the probe face is different from the gallery face: typical feature vectors vary more with pose than with identity. We propose a generative model that creates a one-to-many mapping from an idealized "identity" space to the observed data space. In identity space, the representation for each individual does not vary with pose. We model the measured feature vector as being generated by a pose-contingent linear transformation of the identity variable in the presence of Gaussian noise. We term this model "tied" factor analysis. The choice of linear transformation (factors) depends on the pose, but the loadings are constant (tied) for a given individual. We use the EM algorithm to estimate the linear transformations and the noise parameters from training data. We propose a probabilistic distance metric which allows a full posterior over possible matches to be established. We introduce a novel feature extraction process and investigate recognition performance using the FERET, XM2VTS and PIE databases. Recognition performance compares favourably to contemporary approaches.
Simon Prince, James H. Elder, Jonathan Warrell, Fatima M. Felisberti
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4