Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thammanit Pipatsrisawat

dblp:41/8399 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 33% Automated reasoning and model checking · 33% Logic in computer science · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.112010
A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form · AAAI 2010
Automated reasoning and model checking › knowledge compilation
decomposable negation normal form
0.112010
A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form · AAAI 2010
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge representation
0.112010
A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form · AAAI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vtree analysis · 0.1lower bound proof · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 A Lower Bound on the Size of Decomposable Negation Normal Form
abstract
We consider in this paper the size of a Decomposable Negation Normal Form (DNNF) that respects a given vtree (known as structured DNNF). This representation of propositional knowledge bases was introduced recently and shown to include OBDD as a special case (an OBDD variable ordering is a special type of vtree). We provide a lower bound on the size of any structured DNNF and discuss three particular instances of this bound, which correspond to three distinct subsets of structured DNNF (including OBDD). We show that our lower bound subsumes the influential Sieling and Wegener’s lower bound for OBDDs, which is typically used for identifying variable orderings that will cause a blowup in the OBDD size. We show that our lower bound allows for similar usage but with respect to vtrees, which provide structure for DNNFs in the same way that variable orderings provide structure for OBDDs. We finally discuss some of the theoretical and practical implications of our lower bound.
Thammanit Pipatsrisawat, Adnan Darwiche
AAAI1
2005 Performance analysis of the filtered backprojection image reconstruction algorithms
abstract
We investigate performance tradeoffs for a class of filtered backprojection (FBP) image reconstruction algorithms. The recently developed fast hierarchical backprojection asymptotically achieves the same O(N/sup 2/ log N) cost as Fourier-based methods while retaining many advantages of the FBP technique. In this paper, we provide a detailed cost and performance analysis of the algorithm on a general purpose platform. Based on carefully tuned implementations of both the direct and the hierarchical backprojection, we explore the tradeoffs between distortion and runtime by varying several algorithm and implementation choices. Experimental results show that, given the desired performance, the choice of algorithm parameters is not obvious and largely depends on the image properties and the underlying computer platform.
Thammanit Pipatsrisawat, Aca Gacic, Franz Franchetti, Markus Püschel, José M. F. Moura
ICASSP (5)1