Verification of properties expressed as $\omega$-regular languages such as LTL can benefit hugely from stutter insensitivity, using a diverse set of reduction strategies. However properties that are not stutter invariant, for instance due to the use of the neXt operator of LTL or to some form of counting in the logic, are not covered by these techniques in general. We propose in this paper to study a weaker property than stutter insensitivity. In a stutter insensitive language both adding and removing stutter to a word does not change its acceptance, any stuttering can be abstracted away; by decomposing this equivalence relation into two implications we obtain weaker conditions. We define a shortening insensitive language where any word that stutters less than a word in the language must also belong to the language. A lengthening insensitive language has the dual property. A semi-decision procedure is then introduced to reliably prove shortening insensitive properties or deny lengthening insensitive properties while working with a \emph{reduction} of a system. A reduction has the property that it can only shorten runs. Lipton's transaction reductions or Petri net agglomerations are examples of eligible structural reduction strategies. We also present an approach that can reason using a partition of a property language into its stutter insensitive, shortening insensitive, lengthening insensitive and length sensitive parts to still use structural reductions even when working with arbitrary properties. An implementation and experimental evidence is provided showing most non-random properties sensitive to stutter are actually shortening or lengthening insensitive.

Bounded model checking (BMC) aims at checking whether a model satisfies a property. Most of the existing SAT-based BMC approaches rely on generic strategies, which are supposed to work for any SAT problem. The key idea defended in this paper is to tune SAT solvers algorithm using: (1) a static classification based on the variables used to encode the BMC into a Boolean formula; (2) and use the hierarchy of Manna&Pnueli [33] that classmes any property expressed through Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL). By combining these two information with the classical Literal Block Distance (LBD) measure [46], we designed a new heuristic, well suited for solving BMC problems. In particular, our work identifies and exploits a new set of relevant (learnt) clauses. We experiment with these ideas by developing a tool dedicated for SAT-based LTL BMC solvers, called BSaLTic. Our experiments over a large database of BMC problems, show promising results. In particular, BSaLTic provides good performance on UNSAT problems. This work highlights the importance of considering the structure of the underlying problem in SAT procedures.

Abstract Spot is a C++17 library for LTL and $$\omega $$ ω -automata manipulation, with command-line utilities, and Python bindings. This paper summarizes its evolution over the past six years, since the release of Spot 2.0, which was the first version to support $$\omega $$ ω -automata with arbitrary acceptance conditions, and the last version presented at a conference. Since then, Spot has been extended with several features such as acceptance transformations, alternating automata, games, LTL synthesis, and more. We also shed some lights on the data-structure used to store automata. Artifact: https://zenodo.org/record/6521395 .

Verification of properties expressed as-regular languages such as LTL can benefit hugely from stutter-insensitivity, using a diverse set of reduction strategies. However properties that are not stutter-insensitive, for instance due to the use of the neXt operator of LTL or to some form of counting in the logic, are not covered by these techniques in general. We propose in this paper to study a weaker property than stutter-insensitivity. In a stutter insensitive language both adding and removing stutter to a word does not change its acceptance, any stuttering can be abstracted away; by decomposing this equivalence relation into two implications we obtain weaker conditions. We define a shortening insensitive language where any word that stutters less than a word in the language must also belong to the language. A lengthening insensitive language has the dual property. A semi-decision procedure is then introduced to reliably prove shortening insensitive properties or deny lengthening insensitive properties while working with a reduction of a system. A reduction has the property that it can only shorten runs. Lipton's transaction reductions or Petri net agglomerations are examples of eligible structural reduction strategies. An implementation and experimental evidence is provided showing most nonrandom properties sensitive to stutter are actually shortening or lengthening insensitive. Performance of experiments on a large (random) benchmark from the model-checking competition indicate that despite being a semi-decision procedure, the approach can still improve state of the art verification tools.

International audience