Summary Power is becoming an increasingly important concern for large supercomputer centers. However, to date, there have been a dearth of studies of power usage ‘in the wild’—on production supercomputers running production workloads. In this paper, we present the initial results of a project to characterize the power usage of the three Top500 supercomputers at Los Alamos National Laboratory: Cielo, Roadrunner, and Luna (#15, #19, and #47, respectively, on the June 2012 Top500 list). Power measurements taken both at the switchboard level and within the compute racks are presented and discussed. Some noteworthy results of this study are that (1) variability in power consumption differs across architectures, even when running a similar workload and (2) Los Alamos National Laboratory's scientific workload draws, on average, only 70–75% of LINPACK power and only 40–55% of nameplate power, implying that power capping may enable a substantial reduction in power and cooling infrastructure while impacting comparatively few applications. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract We describe a simulation‐time random sampling of a large‐scale particle simulation, the RoadRunner Universe MC3cosmological simulation, for interactive post‐analysis and visualization. Simulation data generation rates will continue to be far greater than storage bandwidth rates by many orders of magnitude. This implies that only a very small fraction of data generated by a simulation can ever be stored and subsequently post‐analyzed. The limiting factors in this situation are similar to the problem in many population surveys: there aren't enough human resources to query a large population. To cope with the lack of resources, statistical sampling techniques are used to create a representative data set of a large population. Following this analogy, we propose to store a simulation‐time random sampling of the particle data for post‐analysis, with level‐of‐detail organization, to cope with the bottlenecks. A sample is stored directly from the simulation in a level‐of‐detail format for post‐visualization and analysis, which amortizes the cost of post‐processing and reduces workflow time. Additionally by sampling during the simulation, we are able to analyze the entire particle population to record full population statistics and quantify sample error.