Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thodoris Tsilivis

dblp:410/2834 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-1552-7918ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › algorithmic mechanism design
approximation mechanisms
0.912025
Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation · EC 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
bilateral trade
0.912025
Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation · EC 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
interdependent values
0.912025
Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation · EC 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design
0.912025
Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation · EC 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
welfare maximization
0.912025
Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation · EC 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bilateral Trade with Interdependent Values: Information vs. Approximation
abstract
Welfare maximization in bilateral trade has been extensively studied in recent years. Previous literature obtained incentive-compatible approximation mechanisms only for the private values case. In this paper, we study welfare maximization in bilateral trade with interdependent values. Designing mechanisms for interdependent settings is much more challenging because the values of the players depend on the private information of the others, requiring complex belief updates and strategic inference.
Shahar Dobzinski, Alon Eden, Kira Goldner, Ariel Shaulker, Thodoris Tsilivis
EC5