VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhihao Peng 0009
dblp:410/3436
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Debugging and program repair · 70% Program synthesis and code generation · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MCTS-Refined CoT: High-Quality Fine-Tuning Data for LLM-Based Repository Issue Resolution · ASE 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MCTS-Refined CoT: High-Quality Fine-Tuning Data for LLM-Based Repository Issue Resolution · ASE 2025 |
Debugging and program repair
fault localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MCTS-Refined CoT: High-Quality Fine-Tuning Data for LLM-Based Repository Issue Resolution · ASE 2025 |
Debugging and program repair › automated program repair
patch generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MCTS-Refined CoT: High-Quality Fine-Tuning Data for LLM-Based Repository Issue Resolution · ASE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rejection sampling · 0.9reflection mechanism · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MCTS-Refined CoT: High-Quality Fine-Tuning Data for LLM-Based Repository Issue ResolutionabstractLLMs demonstrate strong performance in automated software engineering, particularly for code generation and issue resolution. While proprietary models like GPT-4o achieve high benchmarks scores on SWE-bench, their API dependence, cost, and privacy concerns limit adoption. Open-source alternatives offer transparency but underperform in complex tasks, especially sub-100B parameter models. Although quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data can enhance reasoning, current methods face two critical flaws: (1) weak rejection sampling reduces data quality, and (2) inadequate step validation causes error accumulation. These limitations lead to flawed reasoning chains that impair LLMs’ ability to learn reliable issue resolution.The paper proposes MCTS-REFINE, an enhanced Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based algorithm that dynamically validates and optimizes intermediate reasoning steps through a rigorous rejection sampling strategy, generating high-quality CoT data to improve LLM performance in issue resolution tasks. Key innovations include: (1) augmenting MCTS with a reflection mechanism that corrects errors via rejection sampling and refinement, (2) decomposing issue resolution into three subtasks—File Localization, Fault Localization, and Patch Generation—each with clear ground-truth criteria, and (3) enforcing a strict sampling protocol where intermediate outputs must exactly match verified developer patches, ensuring correctness across reasoning paths.Experiments on SWE-bench Lite and SWE-bench Verified demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned with our CoT dataset achieve substantial improvements over baselines. Notably, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct achieves 28.3%(Lite) and 35.0%(Verified) resolution rates, surpassing SOTA baseline SWE-Fixer-Qwen-72B with the same parameter scale, which only reached 24.7%(Lite) and 32.8%(Verified). Given precise issue locations as input, our fine-tuned Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct model achieves an impressive issue resolution rate of 43.8%(Verified), comparable to the performance of Deepseek-v3. We open-source our MCTS-REFINE framework, CoT dataset, and fine-tuned models to advance research in AI-driven software engineering. Yibo Wang 0008, Zhihao Peng 0009, Ying Wang 0038, Zhao Wei, Hai Yu 0001, Zhiliang Zhu 0001 |
ASE | 2 |