Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Xinyue Sheng

dblp:410/3575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-2009-1044ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 83% Graph learning · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
graph neural network robustness
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial natural language processing
prompt-based attack
0.912025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph foundation model
graph language model
0.312025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312025
TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9adversarial training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks
abstract
Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs), there is a significant research shift from traditional graph learning methods to LLM-based graph frameworks, formally known as GraphLLMs. GraphLLMs leverage the reasoning power of LLMs by integrating three key components: the textual attributes of input nodes, the structural information of node neighborhoods, and task-specific prompts that guide decision-making. Despite their promise, the robustness of GraphLLMs against adversarial perturbations remains largely unexplored-a critical concern for deploying these models in high-stakes scenarios. To bridge the gap, we introduce TrustGLM, a comprehensive study evaluating the vulnerability of GraphLLMs to adversarial attacks across three dimensions: text, graph structure, and prompt manipulations. We implement state-of-the-art attack algorithms from each perspective to rigorously assess model resilience. Through extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets from diverse domains, our findings reveal that GraphLLMs are highly susceptible to text attacks that merely replace a few semantically similar words in a node's textual attribute. We also find that standard graph structure attack methods can significantly degrade model performance, while random shuffling of the candidate label set in prompt templates leads to substantial performance drops. Beyond characterizing these vulnerabilities, we investigate defense techniques tailored to each attack vector through data-augmented training and adversarial training, which show promising potential to enhance the robustness of GraphLLMs. We hope that our open-sourced library will facilitate rapid, equitable evaluation and inspire further innovative research in this field. The benchmark code can be found in https://github.com/Palasonic5/TrustGLM.git.
Qihai Zhang, Xinyue Sheng, Yuanfu Sun, Qiaoyu Tan
KDD (2)2