Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clara Dérand

dblp:410/5524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability
0.912025
Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network › multilayer neural network
polynomial neural networks
0.912025
Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor decomposition · 0.9kruskal uniqueness theorems · 0.9algebraic geometry · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural Networks
abstract
Polynomial Neural Networks (PNNs) possess a rich algebraic and geometric structure. However, their identifiability-a key property for ensuring interpretability-remains poorly understood. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of the identifiability of deep PNNs, including architectures with and without bias terms. Our results reveal an intricate interplay between activation degrees and layer widths in achieving identifiability. As special cases, we show that architectures with non-increasing layer widths are generically identifiable under mild conditions, while encoder-decoder networks are identifiable when the decoder widths do not grow too rapidly compared to the activation degrees. Our proofs are constructive and center on a connection between deep PNNs and low-rank tensor decompositions, and Kruskal-type uniqueness theorems. We also settle an open conjecture on the dimension of PNN's neurovarieties, and provide new bounds on the activation degrees required for it to reach the expected dimension.
Konstantin Usevich, Ricardo Augusto Borsoi, Clara Dérand, Marianne Clausel
NeurIPS3