Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clara Dérand
dblp:410/5524
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network › multilayer neural network
polynomial neural networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tensor decomposition · 0.9kruskal uniqueness theorems · 0.9algebraic geometry · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Identifiability of Deep Polynomial Neural NetworksabstractPolynomial Neural Networks (PNNs) possess a rich algebraic and geometric structure. However, their identifiability-a key property for ensuring interpretability-remains poorly understood. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of the identifiability of deep PNNs, including architectures with and without bias terms. Our results reveal an intricate interplay between activation degrees and layer widths in achieving identifiability. As special cases, we show that architectures with non-increasing layer widths are generically identifiable under mild conditions, while encoder-decoder networks are identifiable when the decoder widths do not grow too rapidly compared to the activation degrees. Our proofs are constructive and center on a connection between deep PNNs and low-rank tensor decompositions, and Kruskal-type uniqueness theorems. We also settle an open conjecture on the dimension of PNN's neurovarieties, and provide new bounds on the activation degrees required for it to reach the expected dimension. Konstantin Usevich, Ricardo Augusto Borsoi, Clara Dérand, Marianne Clausel |
NeurIPS | 3 |