VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ran Tavory
dblp:410/8462
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-5279-9596ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 The LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025 · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark dataset |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › text generation evaluation
retrieval-augmented generation evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark evaluation
shared task |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025 · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.6 | 2 | 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 The LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025 · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.6 | 2 | 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG Evaluation · SIGIR 2026 The LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025 · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
item response theory · 1.0LLM-as-a-judge · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LiveRAG: A Diverse Q&A Dataset with Varying Difficulty Level for RAG EvaluationabstractWith Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) becoming more and more prominent in generative AI solutions, there is an emerging need for systematically evaluating its effectiveness. We introduce the LiveRAG benchmark, a publicly available dataset of 895 synthetic questions and answers designed to support systematic evaluation of RAG-based Q&A systems. This synthetic benchmark is derived from the one used during the SIGIR'2025 LiveRAG challenge, where competitors were evaluated under strict time constraints. It is augmented with information that was not made available to competitors during the challenge, such as the ground-truth answers, together with their associated supporting claims which were used for evaluating competitors' answers. In addition, each question is associated with estimated difficulty and discriminability scores, derived from applying an Item Response Theory model to competitors' responses. Our analysis highlights the benchmark's question diversity, the wide range of difficulty levels, and their usefulness in differentiating between system capabilities. The LiveRAG benchmark will hopefully help the community advance RAG research, conduct systematic evaluation, and develop more robust Q&A systems. David Carmel, Simone Filice, Guy Horowitz, Yoelle Maarek, Alex Shtoff, Oren Somekh, Ran Tavory |
SIGIR | 7 |
| 2025 | The LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025abstractThe LiveRAG Challenge at SIGIR 2025 provides a competitive platform for advancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technologies. Participants from academia and industry have been invited to build a RAG-based question answering system using a fixed corpus (Fineweb-10BT) and a common open-source LLM (Falcon3-10B-Instruct). The goal is to enable fair, focused comparisons on retrieval and prompting strategies. During the Live Challenge Day, the competing teams must provide answers and supportive information to 500 unseen questions within a strict two-hour window. Evaluation is conducted in two stages: automated LLM-as-a-judge scoring mechanism for correctness and faithfulness, followed by a manual review of top ranked submissions. The winners will be announced and prizes awarded during the LiveRAG Workshop at SIGIR 2025 in Padua, Italy. David Carmel, Simone Filice, Guy Horowitz, Yoelle Maarek, Oren Somekh, Ran Tavory |
SIGIR | 6 |