Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Owen Lipchitz

dblp:411/2805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 46% Graph data management · 23% Database system architecture and tuning · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages › graph query language › property graph query language
cypher
0.912025
G-View: View Management for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Graph data management
graph database
0.912025
G-View: View Management for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Data models and query languages
graph query language
0.912025
G-View: View Management for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Database system architecture and tuning
view management
0.912025
G-View: View Management for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Query processing and optimization › materialized view
view materialization
0.312025
G-View: View Management for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

view materialization · 0.9micro-benchmark · 0.9macro-benchmarks · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 G-View: View Management for Graph Databases
abstract
Graph database systems (GDBS) have become popular for representing real-world entities and their relationships, and offering convenient query languages based on graph pattern matching. As graphs increase in size and complexity, GDBS need to provide the appropriate support for abstraction for which views have demonstrated to be an effective tool, facilitating query writing and improving query execution time via materialization techniques. This paper explores how views can be defined and used in GDBS. We propose view-based extensions to the widely used graph query language Cypher, explore a wide range of possible view types, and outline several implementation strategies for view materialization. Using a set of micro- and macro-benchmarks, we provide insight into how expressive different view types are and how effective the proposed implementation strategies are for different GDBS. Our results show that views can be a powerful tool for GDBS, offering great flexibility in query expression and providing performance improvements if materialized.
Yunjia Zheng, Charlotte Sacré, Mohanna Shahrad, Owen Lipchitz, Yuting Gu, Bettina Kemme
Proc. VLDB Endow.4