Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anand Rajan Iyer

dblp:411/4192 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
personalized dialogue
0.912025
In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
memory retrieval
0.912025
In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

summarization · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in open-ended dialogue, yet their inability to retain and retrieve relevant information from long-term interactions limits their effectiveness in applications requiring sustained personalization. External memory mechanisms have been proposed to address this limitation, enabling LLMs to maintain conversational continuity. However, existing approaches struggle with two key challenges. First, rigid memory granularity fails to capture the natural semantic structure of conversations, leading to fragmented and incomplete representations. Second, fixed retrieval mechanisms cannot adapt to diverse dialogue contexts and user interaction patterns. In this work, we propose Reflective Memory Management (RMM), a novel mechanism for long-term dialogue agents, integrating forward- and backward-looking reflections: (1) Prospective Reflection, which dynamically summarizes interactions across granularities—utterances, turns, and sessions—into a personalized memory bank for effective future retrieval, and (2) Retrospective Reflection, which iteratively refines the retrieval in an online reinforcement learning (RL) manner based on LLMs’ cited evidence. Experiments show that RMM demonstrates consistent improvement across various metrics and benchmarks. For example, RMM shows more than 10% accuracy improvement over the baseline without memory management on the LongMemEval dataset.
Zhen Tan 0001, Jun Yan 0001, I-Hung Hsu, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang 0002, Long T. Le, Yiwen Song, Yanfei Chen, Hamid Palangi, Anand Rajan Iyer, Tianlong Chen 0001, Huan Liu 0001, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
ACL (1)11