Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anand Rajan Iyer
dblp:411/4192
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
personalized dialogue |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
memory retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
summarization · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue AgentsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in open-ended dialogue, yet their inability to retain and retrieve relevant information from long-term interactions limits their effectiveness in applications requiring sustained personalization. External memory mechanisms have been proposed to address this limitation, enabling LLMs to maintain conversational continuity. However, existing approaches struggle with two key challenges. First, rigid memory granularity fails to capture the natural semantic structure of conversations, leading to fragmented and incomplete representations. Second, fixed retrieval mechanisms cannot adapt to diverse dialogue contexts and user interaction patterns. In this work, we propose Reflective Memory Management (RMM), a novel mechanism for long-term dialogue agents, integrating forward- and backward-looking reflections: (1) Prospective Reflection, which dynamically summarizes interactions across granularities—utterances, turns, and sessions—into a personalized memory bank for effective future retrieval, and (2) Retrospective Reflection, which iteratively refines the retrieval in an online reinforcement learning (RL) manner based on LLMs’ cited evidence. Experiments show that RMM demonstrates consistent improvement across various metrics and benchmarks. For example, RMM shows more than 10% accuracy improvement over the baseline without memory management on the LongMemEval dataset. Zhen Tan 0001, Jun Yan 0001, I-Hung Hsu, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang 0002, Long T. Le, Yiwen Song, Yanfei Chen, Hamid Palangi, Anand Rajan Iyer, Tianlong Chen 0001, Huan Liu 0001, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister |
ACL (1) | 11 |