Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunfeng Ning

dblp:411/5233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3999-7813ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 46% Language models and text generation · 23% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
1.012026
Privacy-protected Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge Graph Question Answering · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning
1.012026
Recursive Short-to-Long Generalization for Multi-hop Reasoning · SIGIR 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
Privacy-protected Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge Graph Question Answering · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind
1.012026
Tracing Belief-Driven Thoughts with Theory-of-Mind Agents: An Opinion Analysis Framework · WWW 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph reasoning
1.012026
Privacy-protected Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge Graph Question Answering · AAAI 2026
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving search
1.012026
Privacy-protected Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge Graph Question Answering · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.312026
Tracing Belief-Driven Thoughts with Theory-of-Mind Agents: An Opinion Analysis Framework · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structure-oriented abstraction · 3.0relation-centric abstraction · 3.0large language model · 3.0theory-of-mind agents · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Privacy-protected Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge Graph Question Answering
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations and outdated or incomplete knowledge. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is proposed to address these issues by integrating external knowledge like that in knowledge graphs (KGs) into LLMs. However, leveraging private KGs in RAG systems poses significant privacy risks due to the black-box nature of LLMs and potential insecure data transmission. In this paper, we investigate the privacy-protected RAG scenario for the first time, where entities in KGs are anonymous for LLMs, thus preventing them from accessing entity semantics. Due to the loss of semantics of entities, previous RAG systems cannot retrieve question-relevant knowledge from KGs by matching questions with the meaningless identifiers of anonymous entities. To realize an effective RAG system in this scenario, two key challenges must be addressed: (1) How can anonymous entities be converted into retrievable information? (2) How to retrieve question-relevant anonymous entities? To address these challenges, we propose a novel Abstraction Reasoning on Graph (ARoG) framework including relation-centric abstraction and structure-oriented abstraction strategies. For challenge (1), the first strategy abstracts entities into high-level concepts by dynamically capturing the semantics of their adjacent relations. Hence, it supplements meaningful semantics which can further support the retrieval process. For challenge (2), the second strategy transforms unstructured natural language questions into structured abstract concept paths. These paths can be more effectively aligned with the abstracted concepts in KGs, thereby improving retrieval performance. In addition to guiding LLMs to effectively retrieve knowledge from KGs, these abstraction strategies also strictly protect privacy from being exposed to LLMs. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate that ARoG achieves strong performance and privacy-robustness, establishing a new practical direction for privacy-protected RAG systems.
Yunfeng Ning, Mayi Xu, Jintao Wen, Qiankun Pi, Yuanyuan Zhu 0001, Ming Zhong 0002, Jiawei Jiang 0001, Tieyun Qian
AAAI1
2026 Recursive Short-to-Long Generalization for Multi-hop Reasoning
Mayi Xu, Ke Sun 0010, Jianhao Chen 0003, Qiankun Pi, Guixin Su, Yunfeng Ning, Yongqi Li 0002, Yuanyuan Zhu 0001, Ming Zhong 0002, Jiawei Jiang 0001, Tieyun Qian
SIGIR6
2026 Tracing Belief-Driven Thoughts with Theory-of-Mind Agents: An Opinion Analysis Framework
Jintao Wen, Yunfeng Ning, Hankun Kang, Tieyun Qian
WWW2
2026 Reasoning based on symbolic and parametric knowledge bases: A survey
Mayi Xu, Yunfeng Ning, Yongqi Li 0002, Jianhao Chen 0003, Jintao Wen, Birong Pan, Zepeng Bao, Hankun Kang, Ke Sun 0010, Tieyun Qian
Inf. Process. Manag.2