Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Venkata Dhavala

dblp:412/3646 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model checking
0.912025
Verifying PETSc Vector Components Using CIVL · CAV (1) 2025
Program verification
modular verification
0.912025
Verifying PETSc Vector Components Using CIVL · CAV (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Verifying PETSc Vector Components Using CIVL
abstract
Abstract This paper presents a modular approach to verifying the vector module of PETSc, a widely used library in scientific computing, using the CIVL model checker. Our approach relies on the creation of stub functions, which serve a dual purpose of specifying the intended behavior of individual PETSc functions and providing an abstraction for called functions to allow efficient verification of callers. This facilitates the use of symbolic execution and model checking to establish the correctness of isolated functions. Our work contributes to the ongoing effort to enhance the reliability of high-performance computing libraries and proposes an effective verification strategy for complex scientific software.
Venkata Dhavala, Jan Hückelheim, Paul D. Hovland, Stephen F. Siegel
CAV (1)1