Fenil R. Doshi

dblp:412/4267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3978-7782ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › self-supervised visual representation learning
self-supervised vision model
0.912025
Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition
0.912025
Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312025
Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
texture bias
0.312025
Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representational similarity analysis · 0.9attention masking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models
abstract
Humans are able to recognize objects based on both local texture cues and the configuration of object parts, yet contemporary vision models primarily harvest local texture cues, yielding brittle, non-compositional features. Work on shape-vs-texture bias has pitted shape and texture representations in opposition, measuring shape relative to texture, ignoring the possibility that models (and humans) can simultaneously rely on both types of cues, and obscuring the absolute quality of both types of representation. We therefore recast shape evaluation as a matter of absolute configural competence, operationalized by the Configural Shape Score (CSS), which (i) measures the ability to recognize both images in Object-Anagram pairs that preserve local texture while permuting global part arrangement to depict different object categories. Across 86 convolutional, transformer, and hybrid models, CSS (ii) uncovers a broad spectrum of configural sensitivity with fully self-supervised and language-aligned transformers -- exemplified by DINOv2, SigLIP2 and EVA-CLIP -- occupying the top end of the CSS spectrum. Mechanistic probes reveal that (iii) high-CSS networks depend on long-range interactions: radius-controlled attention masks abolish performance showing a distinctive U-shaped integration profile, and representational-similarity analyses expose a mid-depth transition from local to global coding. A BagNet control, whose receptive fields straddle patch seams, remains at chance (iv), ruling out any "border-hacking" strategies. Finally, (v) we show that configural shape score also predicts other shape-dependent evals (e.g., foreground bias, spectral and noise robustness). Overall, we propose that the path toward truly robust, generalizable, and human-like vision systems may not lie in forcing an artificial choice between shape and texture, but rather in architectural and learning frameworks that seamlessly integrate both local-texture and global configural shape.
Fenil R. Doshi, Thomas Fel, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez
NeurIPS1
2025 A feedforward mechanism for human-like contour integration
abstract
Deep neural network models provide a powerful experimental platform for exploring core mechanisms underlying human visual perception, such as perceptual grouping and contour integration-the process of linking local edge elements to arrive at a unified perceptual representation of a complete contour. Here, we demonstrate that feedforward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) fine-tuned on contour detection show this human-like capacity, but without relying on mechanisms proposed in prior work, such as lateral connections, recurrence, or top-down feedback. We identified two key properties needed for ImageNet pre-trained, feed-forward models to yield human-like contour integration: first, progressively increasing receptive field structure served as a critical architectural motif to support this capacity; and second, biased fine-tuning for contour-detection specifically for gradual curves (~20 degrees) resulted in human-like sensitivity to curvature. We further demonstrate that fine-tuning ImageNet pretrained models uncovers other hidden human-like capacities in feed-forward networks, including uncrowding (reduced interference from distractors as the number of distractors increases), which is considered a signature of human perceptual grouping. Thus, taken together these results provide a computational existence proof that purely feedforward hierarchical computations are capable of implementing gestalt "good continuation" and perceptual organization needed for human-like contour-integration and uncrowding. More broadly, these results raise the possibility that in human vision, later stages of processing play a more prominent role in perceptual-organization than implied by theories focused on recurrence and early lateral connections.
Fenil R. Doshi, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez
PLoS Comput. Biol.1