Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Clement Bernard

dblp:412/7645 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA 3D structure prediction
0.912025
RNA-TorsionBERT: leveraging language models for RNA 3D torsion angles prediction · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
scoring function
0.912025
RNA-TorsionBERT: leveraging language models for RNA 3D torsion angles prediction · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
torsion angle prediction
0.912025
RNA-TorsionBERT: leveraging language models for RNA 3D torsion angles prediction · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

language model · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9BERT · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 RNA-TorsionBERT: leveraging language models for RNA 3D torsion angles prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Predicting the 3D structure of RNA is an ongoing challenge that has yet to be completely addressed despite continuous advancements. RNA 3D structures rely on distances between residues and base interactions but also backbone torsional angles. Knowing the torsional angles for each residue could help reconstruct its global folding, which is what we tackle in this work. This paper presents a novel approach for directly predicting RNA torsional angles from raw sequence data. Our method draws inspiration from the successful application of language models in various domains and adapts them to RNA. RESULTS: We have developed a language-based model, RNA-TorsionBERT, incorporating better sequential interactions for predicting RNA torsional and pseudo-torsional angles from the sequence only. Through extensive benchmarking, we demonstrate that our method improves the prediction of torsional angles compared to state-of-the-art methods. In addition, by using our predictive model, we have inferred a torsion angle-dependent scoring function, called TB-MCQ, that replaces the true reference angles by our model prediction. We show that it accurately evaluates the quality of near-native predicted structures, in terms of RNA backbone torsion angle values. Our work demonstrates promising results, suggesting the potential utility of language models in advancing RNA 3D structure prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is freely available on the EvryRNA platform: https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/evryrna/RNA-TorsionBERT.
Clement Bernard, Guillaume Postic, Sahar Ghannay, Fariza Tahi
Bioinform.1
2024 RNAdvisor: a comprehensive benchmarking tool for the measure and prediction of RNA structural model quality
abstract
RNA is a complex macromolecule that plays central roles in the cell. While it is well known that its structure is directly related to its functions, understanding and predicting RNA structures is challenging. Assessing the real or predictive quality of a structure is also at stake with the complex 3D possible conformations of RNAs. Metrics have been developed to measure model quality while scoring functions aim at assigning quality to guide the discrimination of structures without a known and solved reference. Throughout the years, many metrics and scoring functions have been developed, and no unique assessment is used nowadays. Each developed assessment method has its specificity and might be complementary to understanding structure quality. Therefore, to evaluate RNA 3D structure predictions, it would be important to calculate different metrics and/or scoring functions. For this purpose, we developed RNAdvisor, a comprehensive automated software that integrates and enhances the accessibility of existing metrics and scoring functions. In this paper, we present our RNAdvisor tool, as well as state-of-the-art existing metrics, scoring functions and a set of benchmarks we conducted for evaluating them. Source code is freely available on the EvryRNA platform: https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr.
Clement Bernard, Guillaume Postic, Sahar Ghannay, Fariza Tahi
Briefings Bioinform.1