Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sarah Bailey

dblp:413/6092 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
assembly quality assessment
0.812024
AssemblyQC: a Nextflow pipeline for reproducible reporting of assembly quality · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.812024
AssemblyQC: a Nextflow pipeline for reproducible reporting of assembly quality · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly validation
0.212024
AssemblyQC: a Nextflow pipeline for reproducible reporting of assembly quality · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nextflow workflow · 0.8k-mer analysis · 0.8hi-c contact map visualization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 AssemblyQC: a Nextflow pipeline for reproducible reporting of assembly quality
abstract
SUMMARY: Genome assembly projects have grown exponentially due to breakthroughs in sequencing technologies and assembly algorithms. Evaluating the quality of genome assemblies is critical to ensure the reliability of downstream analysis and interpretation. To fulfil this task, we have developed the AssemblyQC pipeline that performs file-format validation, contaminant checking, contiguity measurement, gene- and repeat-space completeness quantification, telomere inspection, taxonomic assignment, synteny alignment, scaffold examination through Hi-C contact-map visualization, and assessments of completeness, consensus quality and phasing through k-mer analysis. It produces a comprehensive HTML report with method descriptions, tables, and visualizations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The pipeline uses Nextflow for workflow orchestration and adheres to the best-practice established by the nf-core community. This pipeline offers a reproducible, scalable, and portable method to assess the quality of genome assemblies-the code is available online at GitHub: https://github.com/Plant-Food-Research-Open/assemblyqc.
Usman Rashid, Jason Shiller, Ken Smith, Ross Crowhurst, Marcus Davy, Ting-Hsuan Chen, Ignacio Carvajal, Sarah Bailey, Susan Thomson 0003, Cecilia H. Deng
Bioinform.9