Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pratyush Avi
dblp:413/7675
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Mathematical optimization · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › sketching
matrix sketching |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learning · COLT 2026 |
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learning · COLT 2026 |
Computational complexity
query complexity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learning · COLT 2026 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learning · COLT 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sketching · 1.0matrix-vector product queries · 1.0covering number arguments · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Query Efficient Structured Matrix LearningabstractWe study the problem of learning a structured approximation (low-rank, sparse, banded, etc.) to an unknown matrix $\boldsymbol{\mathbf{A}}$ given access to matrix-vector product (matvec) queries of the form $\boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}} \mapsto \boldsymbol{\mathbf{A}}\boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}}$ and $\boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}} \mapsto \boldsymbol{\mathbf{A}}^\transpose \boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}}$. This problem is of central importance in scientific computing and machine learning, with applications to structured matrix compression, preconditioning, and as a theoretical model for operator learning. Prior work focuses on obtaining query complexity upper and lower bounds for learning specific structured matrix families that commonly arise in applications. We initiate the study of the problem in greater generality, aiming to understand the query complexity of learning approximations from general matrix families. Our main result focuses on finding a near-optimal approximation to $\boldsymbol{\mathbf{A}}$ from any \emph{finite-sized} family of matrices, $\mathcal{F}$. Standard results from matrix sketching show that $O(\log|\mathcal{F}|)$ matvec queries suffice in this setting. This bound can also be achieved, and is optimal, for vector-matrix-vector queries of the form $\boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}},\boldsymbol{\mathbf{y}}\mapsto \boldsymbol{\mathbf{x}}^\transpose\boldsymbol{\mathbf{A}}\boldsymbol{\mathbf{y}}$, which have been widely studied in work on rank-$1$ matrix sensing. Surprisingly, we show that it is possible to obtain a nearly quadratic improvement in matvec complexity, to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\log|\mathcal{F}|})$ and we prove that this bound is tight up to log-log factors. Via covering number arguments, our result extends to well-studied infinite families. For example, we show that a near-optimal approximation from any \emph{linear matrix family} of dimension $q$ can be learned with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{q})$ matvec queries, improving on an $O(q)$ bound achievable via sketching techniques. Noah Amsel, Pratyush Avi, Tyler Chen, Feyza Duman Keles, Chinmay Hegde, Christopher Musco, Cameron Musco, David Persson |
COLT | 2 |