Manon Vuillien

dblp:413/8867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Computational geometry · 33%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation › point-based representation
point cloud
0.912025
An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters · ICML 2025
Geometric modeling and processing
point set registration
0.912025
An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
barycenter
0.912025
An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.912025
An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters · ICML 2025
Computational geometry
shape analysis
0.912025
An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

procrustes-wasserstein barycenter · 1.7optimal transport · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 An in depth look at the Procrustes-Wasserstein distance: properties and barycenters
abstract
Due to its invariance to rigid transformations such as rotations and reflections, Procrustes-Wasserstein (PW) was introduced in the literature as an optimal transport (OT) distance, alternative to Wasserstein and more suited to tasks such as the alignment and comparison of point clouds. Having that application in mind, we carefully build a space of discrete probability measures and show that over that space PW actually *is* a distance. Algorithms to solve the PW problems already exist, however we extend the PW framework by discussing and testing several initialization strategies. We then introduce the notion of PW barycenter and detail an algorithm to estimate it from the data. The result is a new method to compute representative shapes from a collection of point clouds. We benchmark our method against existing OT approaches, demonstrating superior performance in scenarios requiring precise alignment and shape preservation. We finally show the usefulness of the PW barycenters in an archaeological context. Our results highlight the potential of PW in advancing 2D and 3D point cloud analysis for machine learning and computational geometry applications.
Davide Adamo, Marco Corneli, Manon Vuillien, Emmanuelle Vila
ICML3